Joseph Capela v. Armcon Corporation et al
| Joseph Capela |
| Armcon Corporation doing business as Coachella Valley Collection Service, Eric Ratliff, Coachella Valley Process Servers and Does 1-10 Inclusive |
| 5:2020cv02144 |
| October 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jesus G Bernal |
| Shashi H Kewalramani |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 30
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Jesus G. Bernal: Order (1) DENYING Armcon Corporation and Eric Ratliffs Motions to Dismiss (Dkt. Nos. #22 , #23 ); and (2) VACATING the February 22, 2021 Hearing. SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. (twdb)
|
|
Filing 29
ORDER Continuing Final Pre-Trial Conference and Trial Date and Consolidation with Related Case No. 20-CV-2144-JGB(SHKx) by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. All filings shall be made in the lower case no ED 20-cv-00458-JGB-SHK. The pretrial conference is re-set to July 12, 2021 at 11:00 a.m. The Court Trial is re-set to July 27, 2021, at 9:00 a.m. The clerk is ordered to close case No. ED20-cv-2144-JGB-SHK. Cases associated with Lead Case EDCV20-458 JGB(SHKx), (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (twdb)
|
|
Filing 28
SCHEDULING NOTICE AND ORDER by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. On the Court's own motion, Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (Dkt. Nos. #22 and #23 ) set for hearing on January 25, 2021, are hereby continued to February 22, 2021, at 9:00 A.M. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (npo) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 27 REPLY REPLY IN SUPPORT OF RATLIFF'S 12(B)(6) MOTION Second NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #23 filed by Defendant Eric Ratliff. (Endler, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 26 REPLY in support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6) #22 filed by Defendant Armcon Corporation. (Parlow, Daniel) |
| Filing 25 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to Second NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #23 Defendant Eric Ratliff filed by Plaintiff Joseph Capela. (Rundquist, Andrew) |
| Filing 24 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6) #22 Defendant Armcon Corporation filed by Plaintiff Joseph Capela. (Rundquist, Andrew) |
| Filing 23 Second NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Eric Ratliff. Motion set for hearing on 1/25/2021 at 09:00 AM before Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Request for Judicial Notice, #2 Proposed Order to Dismiss FAC (FRCP 12(b)(6))) (Endler, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 22 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6) filed by Defendant Armcon Corporation. Motion set for hearing on 1/25/2021 at 09:00 AM before Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (Attachments: #1 Request for Judicial Notice, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Proposed Order) (Parlow, Daniel) |
|
Filing 21
SCHEDULING NOTICE AND ORDER by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. On December 10, 2020, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 20). Accordingly, the Court deems the Motions to Dismiss (Dkt. Nos. #15 and #17 ) denied as moot. The hearing set for December 21, 2020, is hereby vacated. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (npo) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 20 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants All Defendants amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by Plaintiff Joseph Capela(Rundquist, Andrew) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE OF NON-OPPOSITION to MOTION #17 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6) #15 and Intent to File First Amended Complaint per FRCP 15(a)(1)(b) filed by Plaintiff Joseph Capela. (Rundquist, Andrew) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice of Motion #17 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Motion to dismiss. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (twdb) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE OF MOTION re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6) #15 filed by Defendant Eric Ratliff. Motion set for hearing on 12/21/2020 at 09:00 AM before Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (Attachments: #1 Request for Judicial Notice, #2 Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Motion to Dismiss)(Attorney Jeffrey B Endler added to party Eric Ratliff (pty:dft))(Endler, Jeffrey) Modified on 11/20/2020 (twdb). |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Armcon Corporation, (Parlow, Daniel) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6) filed by Defendant Armcon Corporation. Motion set for hearing on 12/21/2020 at 09:00 AM before Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (Attachments: #1 Request for Judicial Notice, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Proposed Order) (Attorney Daniel Martin Parlow added to party Armcon Corporation(pty:dft)) (Parlow, Daniel) |
|
Filing 14
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (ima)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO Local Rule 83-1.3.1 and General Order 19-03 -Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 5:20-cv-00458-JGB-SHKx. Case referred from Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani for DISCOVERY. The case number will now read as follows: 5:20-cv-02144-JGB (SHKx). Signed by Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (aco)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (ghap) |
| Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Eric Ratliff. (ghap) |
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Coachella Valley Process Servers. (ghap) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Armcon Corporation. (ghap) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiff JOSEPH CAPELA. Related Case(s): 5:20-cv-00458-JGB-SHK (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Rundquist, Andrew) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff JOSEPH CAPELA. (Rundquist, Andrew) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff JOSEPH CAPELA. (Rundquist, Andrew) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff JOSEPH CAPELA. (Rundquist, Andrew) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff JOSEPH CAPELA. (Rundquist, Andrew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-28533701 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff JOSEPH CAPELA. (Attorney Andrew Paul Rundquist added to party JOSEPH CAPELA(pty:pla))(Rundquist, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
