Vanessa L. Salas et al v. Ford Motor Company, et al
Vanessa L. Salas and Ruben Albert Salas, Jr. |
Ford Motor Company and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
5:2020cv02177 |
October 16, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Virginia A Phillips |
Sheri Pym |
Prop. Damage Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Product Liability |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 TRANSMITTAL of documents to San Bernardino Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to San Bernardino Superior Court. (yl) |
Filing 21 ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO REMAND CASE TO STATE COURT by Judge Virginia A. Phillips #20 . Pursuant to Local Rules 7-1 and 52-4.1, the Court has reviewed the Stipulation to Remand Case to State Court and hereby orders as follows: The Action shall be remanded to State Court in accordance with the parties'stipulation. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (yl) |
Filing 20 Joint STIPULATION to Remand Case to State Court filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Avelar, Jason) |
Filing 19 MINUTE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR IMPROPER REMOVAL (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Virginia A. Phillips: The Court therefore ORDERS Ford to show cause, in writing, no later than March 17, 2021, why this case should not be remanded for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiffs may file a response to Fords filing no later than March 19, 2021. IT IS SO ORDERED. (See document for further details) (yl) |
Filing 18 MINUTE ORDER SETTING TRIAL DATES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Virginia A. Phillips: The Court has reviewed the parties' Joint Rule 26(f) Report. (Dkt. 14). The Court adopts the following schedule: Last date for hearing motions to amend pleadings or add parties: 5/3/2021; Last date to conduct settlement conference (ADR no. 2): 4/26/2021; Initial Expert Disclosures: 6/7/2021; Rebuttal Expert Disclosures: 6/21/2021; All Discovery cutoff: 8/2/2021; Last date for hearing non-discovery motions: 9/13/2021; Pre-trial conference (hearing on motions in limine): 10/4/2021 at 2:30 p.m.; Trial date (jury trial, 3 days): 10/19/2021 at 8:30 a.m. As it was not discussed in the 26(f) Report, the parties are encouraged to consider consenting to proceed before a magistrate judge for all purposes in accordance with Local Rule 73-3. (bm) |
Filing 17 ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 2 by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. Case ordered to Court Mediation Panel for mediation. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than April 26, 2021. (cch) |
Filing 16 CIVIL TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. Initial Designation of Expert Witnesses due by: June 7, 2021, Designation of Rebuttal Expert Witnesses due by: June 21, 2021, Summary Judgment Motion hearing cut-off by September 13, 2021 at 2:00 p.m., Last day to conduct mediation: April 26, 2021, Amended Pleadings due by 5/3/2021. Discovery cut-off 8/2/2021. Pretrial Conference set for 10/4/2021 at 02:30 PM. Jury Trial set for 10/19/2021 at 08:30 AM before Judge Virginia A. Phillips. Trial Estimate: 3 days. (cch) |
Filing 15 SCHEDULING NOTICE AND ORDER by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. COUNSEL OF RECORD ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED, on the Court's own motion, the Scheduling Conference set on February 22, 2021 is TAKEN OFF CALENDAR. No appearance by counsel will be necessary. The Court will issue such further orders as deemed appropriate. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cch) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 14 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 3-4 court days, filed by Plaintiffs Vanessa L. Salas, Ruben Albert Salas, Jr... (Daghighian, Sepehr) |
Filing 13 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Erik K Schmitt counsel for Plaintiffs Vanessa L. Salas, Ruben Albert Salas, Jr.. Adding Erik. K. Schmitt as counsel of record for Vanessa L. Salas and Ruben Albert Salas Jr. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiffs Vanessa L. Salas and Ruben Albert Salas Jr.. (Schmitt, Erik) |
Filing 12 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Sepehr Daghighian counsel for Plaintiffs Vanessa L. Salas, Ruben Albert Salas, Jr.. Adding Sepehr Daghighian as counsel of record for Vanessa L. Salas and Ruben Albert Salas Jr. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiffs Vanessa L. Salas and Ruben Albert Salas Jr.. (Daghighian, Sepehr) |
Filing 11 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs All Plaintiffs, (Rosenstein, Michael) |
Filing 10 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Michael H Rosenstein counsel for Plaintiffs Vanessa L. Salas, Ruben Albert Salas, Jr.. Adding Michael H. Rosenstein as counsel of record for Vanessa L. Salas and Ruben Albert Salas Jr. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiffs Vanessa L. Salas and Ruben Albert Salas Jr.. (Rosenstein, Michael) |
Filing 9 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. Scheduling Conference set for 2/22/2021 at 01:30 PM before Judge Virginia A. Phillips. (cch) |
Filing 8 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. (cch) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case. This case was initially assigned to District Judge John W. Holcomb and referred to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 19-03, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge Virginia A. Phillips. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:20-cv-02177 VAP (SPx). (esa) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Does, Ford Motor Company, Jury Demanded, filed by plaintiffs Vanessa L. Salas, Ruben Albert Salas, Jr. (filed in state court 8/11/20, submitted as document 1, attachment 2) (esa) |
COPY OF SERVICE OF PROCESS TRANSMITTAL executed by Plaintiffs Vanessa L. Salas, Ruben Albert Salas,Jr., upon Defendant Ford Motor Company served on 9/16/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CT Corporation, Agent for Service of Process by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (non-conformed, submitted as document 1, attachment 6, p. 2) (esa) |
COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by defendant Ford Motor Company. (non-conformed, submitted as document 1, attachment 3)(esa) |
Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #4 , Jury Demand #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 served on 10/16/2020. (Avelar, Jason) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company, (Avelar, Jason) |
Filing 3 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company.. (Avelar, Jason) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Avelar, Jason) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Bernardino, case number CIVDS2017000 Receipt No: ACACDC-28581509 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit Decl. Ex. A - Summons and Complaint, #3 Exhibit Decl. Ex. B - Answer, #4 Exhibit Decl. Ex. C 10-K Filing, #5 Exhibit Decl. Ex. D - Purchase Agreement, #6 Exhibit Decl. Ex. E - All Pleadings) (Attorney Jason M Avelar added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft))(Avelar, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.