Jose Verdin v. Ford Motor Company et al
Plaintiff: Jose Verdin
Defendant: Ford Motor Company and Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Case Number: 5:2020cv02254
Filed: October 27, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Pedro V Castillo
Referring Judge: John W Holcomb
Nature of Suit: Prop. Damage Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 12, 2021 Filing 14 Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to settled filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Proudfoot, Matthew)
January 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 SCHEDULING NOTICE AND ORDER by Judge John W. Holcomb: In light of the Notice of Settlement filed January 12, 2021 (ECF No. #11 ), indicating that the case has settled, this action is placed in inactive status. By April 13, 2021, the parties shall file either (1) a Stipulation of Dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); (2) a Stipulation for an Order of Dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2); or a motion to reopen if settlement has not been consummated. Upon the failure to comply with this Order in a timely manner, this action shall be deemed dismissed as of April 14, 2021. This Court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party. All previously set deadlines and dates are hereby VACATED. (JS-6) THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (iva) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
January 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ("OSC") by Judge John W. Holcomb: The Court has received the parties' Notice of Settlement (ECF No. #11 ), filed in response to the Court's OSC (ECF No. #10 ). The Court accepts the response and hereby orders the OSC DISCHARGED. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (iva) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
January 12, 2021 Filing 11 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Plaintiff Jose Verdin. (Barry, David)
January 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause Why Sanctions Should Not Be Imposed Against Plaintiff's and Defendant's Counsel for Failure to File a Rule 26(f) Report by Judge John W. Holcomb: Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS counsel for Plaintiff, David N. Barry, and counsel for Defendant, Matthew M. Proudfoot, to show cause why they should not each be sanctioned in the amount of $500 for their failure to file a timely Joint Rule 26(f) report. Counsel shall respond in writing to this Order to Show Cause by Monday, January 18, 2021, at 12:00 noon. (See document for further details) (yl)
November 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John W. Holcomb. Scheduling Conference set for 1/22/2021 at 11:00 AM before Judge John W. Holcomb. (iva)
November 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 STANDING ORDER by Judge John W. Holcomb. (iva)
October 29, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
October 29, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John W. Holcomb and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (ghap)
October 27, 2020 NON CONFORM COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL)(ghap)
October 27, 2020 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 20, inclusive, Ford Motor Company. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Jose Verdin. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 7/27/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL) (ghap)
October 27, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company, (Proudfoot, Matthew)
October 27, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Matthew M Proudfoot on behalf of Defendant Ford Motor Company (Proudfoot, Matthew)
October 27, 2020 Filing 3 DECLARATION of Matthew M. Proudfoot re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Proudfoot, Matthew)
October 27, 2020 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Proudfoot, Matthew)
October 27, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Bernardino, case number CIVDS2015221 Receipt No: ACACDC-28733221 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Summons & Complaint - State Court, #2 Answer to Complaint - State Court) (Attorney Matthew M Proudfoot added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft))(Proudfoot, Matthew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jose Verdin v. Ford Motor Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Represented By: Matthew M Proudfoot
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jose Verdin
Represented By: David N Barry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?