Elizabeth Najera Medina v. United States of America, et al
Elizabeth Najera Medina |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DOES 1-100, inclusive, and Does 1-100, inclusive |
5:2020cv02277 |
October 30, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Consuelo B Marshall |
Sheri Pym |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1346 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 8 60 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant United States of America. (esa) |
Filing 7 Notice to counsel re consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge Eastern Division Blackout Case. (esa) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (esa) |
Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Elizabeth Najera Medina. (Albert, Jessica) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Elizabeth Najera Medina, (Albert, Jessica) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties (Albert, Jessica) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Elizabeth Najera Medina. (Albert, Jessica) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-28791478 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Elizabeth Najera Medina. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit) (Attorney Jessica Anna Albert added to party Elizabeth Najera Medina(pty:pla))(Albert, Jessica) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.