Root Four Imagination, Inc. v. Thinkcar, Inc. et al
Root Four Imagination, Inc. |
Thinkcar, Inc. and Thinkcar Tech Inc. |
5:2020cv02343 |
November 10, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
Shashi H Kewalramani |
Trademark |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ORDER OF THE CHIEF JUDGE (#20-200) approved by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Pursuant to the recommended procedure adopted by the Court for the CREATION OF CALENDAR of Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha, this case is transferred from Judge Jesus G. Bernal to the calendar of Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 5:20-cv-02343-FLA(SHKx). (ap) |
Filing 14 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (ima) |
Filing 13 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Root Four Imagination, Inc.. (Lebron-Dykeman, Christine) |
Filing 12 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachments 1 Civil Cover Sheet is attached to the Complaint. Each of these documents should have been filed and entered separately under its correct event/relief. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ghap) |
Filing 11 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Re: Add and Terminate Attorneys. Due to clerical error. The docket clerk added Rachel Kaufman in error onto this case. (ghap) |
Filing 10 NOTICE TO COUNSEL RE: Copyright, Patent and Trademark Reporting Requirements. Counsel shall file the appropriate AO-120 and/or AO-121 form with the Clerk within 10 days. (ghap) |
Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Thinkcar, Inc. (ghap) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 as to Defendant Thinkcar Tech Inc. (ghap) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (ghap) |
Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 filed by Plaintiff Root Four Imagination, Inc.. (Lebron-Dykeman, Christine) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by :Plaintiff Root Four Imagination, Inc., (Lebron-Dykeman, Christine) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 filed by Plaintiff Root Four Imagination, Inc.. (Lebron-Dykeman, Christine) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 filed by Plaintiff Root Four Imagination, Inc.. (Lebron-Dykeman, Christine) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-28940780 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Root Four Imagination, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1_3,988,963 Registration Certificate, #3 Exhibit 2_2,988,964 Registration, #4 Exhibit 3_3,988,965 Registration, #5 Exhibit 4_4,549,867 Registration, #6 Exhibit 5_5,885,692 Registration, #7 Exhibit 6_87960482 Application) (Attorney Christine Lebron-Dykeman added to party Root Four Imagination, Inc.(pty:pla))(Lebron-Dykeman, Christine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.