VIP Products L.L.C. v. Rolf C. Hagen USA Corp
| VIP Products L.L.C. |
| Rolf C. Hagen (USA) Corp, Rolf C. Hagen (USA) Corp. and Rolf C. Hagen USA Corp |
| 5:2020cv02353 |
| November 11, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jesus G Bernal |
| Kenly Kiya Kato |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1127 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
SCHEDULING NOTICE and ORDER by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. In light of the Notice of Settlement filed January 6, 2021 (Doc. No. #12 ), indicating that the case has settled in its entirety, this action is placed in inactive status. By March 8, 2021, the parties shall file either (1) a proper stipulation and order for dismissal or judgment or (2) a motion to reopen if settlement has not been consummated. Upon the failure to timely comply with this Order, this action shall be deemed dismissed as of March 9, 2021. This Court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party. All previously set deadlines and dates are hereby VACATED. IT IS SO ORDERED. (JS-6)THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (npo) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Plaintiff VIP Products L.L.C.. (Glazer, Marvin) |
| Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Rolf C. Hagen (USA) Corp. answer now due 1/6/2021, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Rolf C. Hagen (USA) Corp..(Attorney Mark B Mizrahi added to party Rolf C. Hagen (USA) Corp.(pty:dft))(Mizrahi, Mark) |
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (ima)
|
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff VIP Products L.L.C., upon Defendant Rolf C. Hagen USA Corp served on 11/16/2020, answer due 12/7/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon PETER CAYETANO, INTAKE SPECIALIST, CT CORPORATION SYSTEM, REGISTERED AGENT FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Glazer, Marvin) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Rolf C. Hagen USA Corp. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Report on Filing of Patent/Trademark Action (Initial Notification)(AO 120) #4 , Corporate Disclosure Statement #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by plaintiff VIP Products L.L.C.. (Glazer, Marvin) |
| Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by VIP Products L.L.C.. (Glazer, Marvin) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff VIP Products L.L.C. (Glazer, Marvin) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff VIP Products L.L.C.. (Glazer, Marvin) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-28964051 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff VIP Products L.L.C.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. 1 - Reg. No. 3,512,293 for MIGHTY, #2 Exhibit Ex. 2 - Plaintiff MIGHTY header card, #3 Exhibit Ex. 3 - hagendirect.com private client login) (Attorney Marvin A Glazer added to party VIP Products L.L.C.(pty:pla))(Glazer, Marvin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
