Danny Armenta v. Stater Bros. Markets et al
| Danny Armenta |
| Stater Bros. Markets and DOES 1-50, inclusive |
| 5:2020cv02364 |
| November 13, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Kenly Kiya Kato |
| Mark C Scarsi |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 25 OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss and/or Strike Plaintiff's Complaint #18 filed by Plaintiff Danny Armenta. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Mitchell J. Murray, #2 Plaintiff's Request for Judicial Notice, #3 Plaintiff's Objections to Defendant's Request for Judicial Notice, #4 Plaintiff's Evidentiary Objections to Declaration of Jeff T. Olsen)(Murray, Mitchell) |
| Filing 24 OPPOSITION re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Riverside Superior Court #10 filed by Defendant Stater Bros. Markets. (Attachments: #1 Request for Judicial Notice, #2 Declaration of Sonia Munoz in Support of Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand, #3 Exhibit 1 to Declaration of Sonia Munoz in Support of Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand, #4 Exhibit 2 to Declaration of Sonia Munoz in Support of Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand, #5 Exhibit 3 to Declaration of Sonia Munoz in Support of Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand)(Brandt, Brendan) |
| Filing 23 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss #18 by Clerk. The document is accepted as filed. Judge Scarsi does not require a proposed order be efiled/lodged with motions. (lom) |
Filing 22
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO FILE OPPOSITION AND HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF NO. #19 ) by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (lom)
|
| Filing 21 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss and/or Strike Plaintiff's Complaint #18 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment. Other error(s) with document(s): No [Prop] Order attached. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lom) |
| Filing 20 OPPOSITION re: EX PARTE APPLICATION for Extension of Time to File Opposition EX PARTE APPLICATION to Continue Hearing on Defendants Motion to Dismiss from March 15, 2021 to April 19, 2021 or a date convenient to the Courts calendar #19 filed by Defendant Stater Bros. Markets. (Brandt, Brendan) |
| Filing 19 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Extension of Time to File Opposition, EX PARTE APPLICATION to Continue Hearing on Defendants Motion to Dismiss from March 15, 2021 to April 19, 2021 or a date convenient to the Courts calendar filed by PLAINTIFF Danny Armenta. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proposed Order) (Lucio, Christina) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss and/or Strike Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Defendant Stater Bros. Markets. Motion set for hearing on 3/15/2021 at 09:00 AM before Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (Attachments: #1 Request for Judicial Notice, #2 Declaration of Jeff T. Olsen in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, #3 Exhibit A to Declaration of Jeff T. Olsen, #4 Exhibit B to Declaration of Jeff T. Olsen, #5 Exhibit C to Declaration of Jeff T. Olsen, #6 Exhibit D to Declaration of Jeff T. Olsen, #7 Exhibit E to Declaration of Jeff T. Olsen, #8 Exhibit F to Declaration of Jeff T. Olsen, #9 Exhibit G to Declaration of Jeff T. Olsen, #10 Exhibit H to Declaration of Jeff T. Olsen, #11 Exhibit I to Declaration of Jeff T. Olsen) (Brandt, Brendan) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER DENYING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS AND OTHER LITIGATION DEADLINES #16 by Judge Mark C. Scarsi (lc)
|
| Filing 16 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading and Other Litigation Deadlines as to Stipulation and Order,,, Set/Reset Deadlines,,, Set/Reset Motion Hearing and R&R Deadlines,, #15 , Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply, #14 filed by Defendant Stater Bros. Markets. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Further Joint Stipulation to Extend Time to File Responsive Pleading and Other Litigation Deadlines by Approx. 30 Days)(Olsen, Jeff) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING AND OTHER LITIGATION DEADLINES #14 by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. The following is so ordered: Defendant's deadline to file its Motion to Dismiss shall be February 15, 2021 and the deadlines for the respective Opposition and Reply briefs shall be re-calculated in accordance with the Local Rules; and The hearing on Plaintiff's Motion for Remand, currently scheduled for January 25, 2021, shall be continued to March 15, 2021, at 9:00 a.m. and the deadlines for the respective Opposition and Reply briefs shall be re-calculated in accordance with Local Rules. (lom)
|
| Filing 14 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response as to Complaint - (Discovery), NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Riverside Superior Court #10 filed by Defendant Stater Bros. Markets. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING AND OTHER LITIGATION DEADLINES BY APPROX. 60 DAYS)(Olsen, Jeff) |
| Filing 13 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Riverside Superior Court #10 by Clerk. The document is accepted as filed. (lom) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Riverside Superior Court #10 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment. Other error(s) with document(s): No [Prop] Order is attached. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lom) |
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Danny Armenta, re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Riverside Superior Court #10 served on 12/14/2020. (Murray, Mitchell) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Riverside Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Danny Armenta. Motion set for hearing on 1/25/2021 at 09:00 AM before Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities) (Murray, Mitchell) |
| Filing 9 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Stater Bros. Markets answer now due 12/20/2020, re Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Stater Bros. Markets.(Olsen, Jeff) |
|
Filing 8
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MARK C. SCARSI upon filing of the complaint by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case. This case was initially assigned to District Judge John W. Holcomb and referred to Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 19-03, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:20-cv-02364 MCS (KKx). (esa) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE executed by Plaintiff Danny Armenta, upon Defendant Stater Bros. Markets served on 10/14/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Bruce Varner, Agent for Service of Process, in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity. Original Summons NOT returned. (filed in state court 10/23/20, submitted as document 1, attachment 3) (esa) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Does, Stater Bros. Markets. Jury Demanded, filed by plaintiff Danny Armenta. (filed in state court 9/8/20, submitted as document 1, attachment 1) (esa) |
| Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Stater Bros. Markets identifying Stater Bros. Holdings Inc. as Corporate Parent. (Brandt, Brendan) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Stater Bros. Markets. Related Case(s): 5:18-cv-02600-SJO-KK; 5:19-cv- 00755-AB-SS; 5:19-cv-01097-SJO-KK (Brandt, Brendan) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Stater Bros. Markets, identifying Stater Bros. Holdings Inc.. (Brandt, Brendan) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Stater Bros. Markets. (Brandt, Brendan) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Riverside Superior Court, case number RIC2003532 Receipt No: ACACDC-29002067 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Stater Bros. Markets. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Complaint, #2 Exhibit B-Summons, #3 Exhibit C-Proof of Service, #4 Exhibit D-Misc. Court Docs, #5 Exhibit E-Collective Bargaining Agreement, #6 Exhibit F-Collective Bargaining Agreement Extension, #7 Exhibit G-Armenta Settlement Agreement) (Attorney Brendan W Brandt added to party Stater Bros. Markets(pty:dft))(Brandt, Brendan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
