Elijah Smith v. People of the State of California et al
| Elijah Smith, Jr. and Elijah Smith |
| Sheriff Deputy of Los Angeles, People of the State of California, Mr. Tucker and Safety Branch of El Segundo |
| 5:2020cv02373 |
| November 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| Mark C Scarsi |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 JUDGMENT by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (dml) |
Filing 4
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE SUMMARY DISMISSAL by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. IT IS ORDERED THAT the Complaint is DISMISSED. (dml)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi and referred to Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (et) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING OF COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES OR REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (CV-93). (et) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants People of the State of California, Safety Branch of El Segundo, Sheriff Deputy of Los Angeles, Tucker pursuant to 42:1983. Case assigned to Judge Mark C. Scarsi and referred to Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver., filed by Plaintiff Elijah Smith, Jr. (et) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
