Jeffrey Alan Weiss v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Alan Weiss
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Petitioner: Social Security Commissioner
Case Number: 5:2021cv00001
Filed: January 3, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: David O Carter
Referring Judge: Shashi H Kewalramani
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 17, 2021 Filing 18 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Stacy Wiesbrock counsel for Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. Tina Naicker is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (Wiesbrock, Stacy)
February 17, 2021 Filing 17 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. correcting Consent to Proceed before U S Magistrate Judge (AUSA filers only) - Non-Final, #15 (Naicker, Tina)
February 17, 2021 Filing 16 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (Attorney Stacy Wiesbrock added to party Commissioner of Social Security(pty:dft))(Wiesbrock, Stacy)
February 17, 2021 Filing 15 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (Attorney Tina Naicker added to party Commissioner of Social Security(pty:dft))(Naicker, Tina)
February 13, 2021 Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Alan Weiss, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to C. Veloz. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to illegible. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to illegible. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Mouradian, Lisa)
February 13, 2021 Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Alan Weiss, upon Defendant Commissioner of Social Security served on 2/6/2021, answer due 4/7/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to C. Veloz. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to illegible. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to illegible. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Mouradian, Lisa)
February 13, 2021 Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Alan Weiss, upon Defendant Commissioner of Social Security served on 2/2/2021, answer due 4/5/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to illegible. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to illegible. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to illegible. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Mouradian, Lisa)
January 21, 2021 Filing 11 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to dft Commissioner of Social Security. (dc)
January 20, 2021 Filing 10 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Order #9 filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Alan Weiss. (Mouradian, Lisa)
January 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER RE: PROCEDURES IN SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL (JOINT SUBMISSION FORMAT) by Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (dc)
January 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani: granting #4 APPLICATION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis (dc)
January 12, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Alan Weiss, (Mouradian, Lisa)
January 11, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Application #4 #3 ; Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. The case initiating documents were filed under the incorrect Event #4 #3 . Please utilize CM/ECF resources such as the search tool to locate the appropriate events for filing. No further action is required unless directed by the Court. (jtil)
January 11, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (jtil)
January 6, 2021 Filing 4 APPLICATION to Appeal in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Alan Weiss. (Mouradian, Lisa)
January 6, 2021 Filing 3 APPLICATION to Appeal in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Alan Weiss. (Mouradian, Lisa)
January 5, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: A case-initiating document was submitted without payment of the full filing fee. Within two business days of this notice, counsel must pay the filing fee or file a request to proceed in forma pauperis;otherwise, the docket for this case number will be closed and no further filings will be permitted under this case number. The filing fee may be paid online by docketing the event Pay Filing Fee. (jtil)
January 3, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Alan Weiss. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit) (Attorney Lisa S Mouradian added to party Jeffrey Alan Weiss(pty:bkmov))(Mouradian, Lisa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jeffrey Alan Weiss v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Alan Weiss
Represented By: Lisa S Mouradian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Social Security Commissioner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Tina Naicker
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Represented By: Stacy Wiesbrock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?