Jane Doe v. Dustin Lloyd
| Jane Doe |
| Michael Hestrin, Board of Supervisor John Tavaglione, Michael Helstrin, Manuel Perez, V. Manuel Perez, Chuck Washington, Dustin Lloyd, Riverside County, JF Tavaglione, Does 1-50, Kevin Jefferies, Stan Sniff, Marion Ashley and Kevin Jeffries |
| 5:2021cv00096 |
| January 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jesus G Bernal |
| Shashi H Kewalramani |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 57
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (ima)
|
| Filing 56 NOTICE OF RECEIPT OF CASE TRANSFERRED IN: Formerly Case Number: 3:18-cv-02021 MMA-LL, from Southern District of California. The above-referenced case has been transferred to this district and assigned the above civil case number 5:21-cv-00096 JGB (SHKx). (esa) |
| Filing 55 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 54 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (esa) |
| Filing 53 ORIGINAL file, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received from California Southern |
| Filing 52 Case transferred to District of United States District Court, Central District of California, Eastern Division. Files transferred electronically to: *United States District Court, Central District of California, Eastern Division*.*3470 Twelfth Street, 1st Floor**Riverside, CA 92501-3801*. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 1/15/2021. (Attachments: #1 Transfer Order) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (tcf) (jms). [Transferred from California Southern on 1/20/2021.] |
| Filing 51 RESPONSE in Opposition re #49 MOTION for Order filed by Dustin Lloyd. (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Christiansen, Allen) (jmo). [Transferred from California Southern on 1/20/2021.] |
|
Filing 50
ORDER Requiring Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Life Stay [Doc. No. #49 ]. The Court ORDERS Defendant to file a response to Plaintiff's motion to lift the stay of this action on or before 1/22/2021. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 1/13/2021. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (tcf) [Transferred from California Southern on 1/20/2021.]
|
| Filing 49 MOTION to Order Judgment of 5 Million Dollars, Request Hearing Date if Needed; Request to Unstay Complaint by Jane Doe. Nunc Pro Tunc 12/18/20 (dlg) [Transferred from California Southern on 1/20/2021.] |
|
Filing 48
Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge Michael M. Anello Accepting Document: Motionto to order Judgement and Reopen Case, from Plaintiff Jane Doe. Non-compliance with local rule(s), Civ. L. Rule 5.1: Missing time and date on motion and/or supporting documentation. Nunc Pro Tunc 12/18/20. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 12/23/20.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dlg) [Transferred from California Southern on 1/20/2021.]
|
| Filing 47 NOTICE of Vacated Hearing(s) : June 1, 2020 Mandatory Settlement Conference vacated in light of the Court's Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion to Stay, issued on October 14, 2019. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(no document attached) (fk1) [Transferred from California Southern on 1/20/2021.] |
|
Filing 46
ORDER to Substitute Attorney. Attorney Allen Christiansen added and Kelly Anne Moran terminated. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 1/22/2020. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (tcf) [Transferred from California Southern on 1/20/2021.]
|
| Filing 45 NOTICE Consent Order Granting Substitution of Attorneys by Dustin Lloyd (Christiansen, Allen)Attorney Allen Christiansen added to party Dustin Lloyd (pty:dft) (tcf). [Transferred from California Southern on 1/20/2021.] |
|
Filing 44
ORDER Granting #42 Plaintiff's Motion to Stay. The Court grants Plaintiff's motion and stays this action pending the disposition of the pending criminal charges against Plaintiff in Riverside County Superior Court. The Court directs Plaintiff to timely advise the Court in writing via a "Status Report" of the final disposition of those proceedings, at which time the Court will lift the stay of these proceedings. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 10/24/2019. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rmc) [Transferred from California Southern on 1/20/2021.]
|
|
Filing 43
Minute Order Vacating Motion Hearing: Plaintiff Jane Doe has filed a #42 motion to stay this matter, currently set for hearing on October 28, 2019. The motion is unopposed. The Court in its discretion takes the matter under submission without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b). Accordingly, no appearances are required and the Court vacates the previously scheduled motion hearing. The Court will issue a written ruling in due course. SO ORDERED by Judge Michael M. Anello on 10/22/2019. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (no document attached) (amk) [Transferred from California Southern on 1/20/2021.]
|
| Filing 42 MOTION to Stay by Jane Doe. Nunc Pro Tunc 9/30/2019. (rmc) [Transferred from California Southern on 1/20/2021.] |
| Filing 41 Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by the Chambers of Judge Michael M. Anello Accepting Document: Plaintiff's Motion to Stay District Court Proceedings Pending Resolution of Criminal Case The People v. Jane Doe (Pseudonym) Larson Justice Center, Indio, from Plaintiff Jane Doe. Non-compliance with local rule(s), Civ. L. Rule 7.1: Lacking memorandum of points and authorities in support as a separate document. Nunc Pro Tunc 9/30/2019. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rmc) [Transferred from California Southern on 1/20/2021.] |
| Filing 40 Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by the Chambers of Magistrate Judge Linda Lopez Rejecting Document: Joint Stipulation for Protective Order, from Plaintiff Jane Doe. Non-compliance with local rule(s), OTHER: FRCvP8- Duplicate Filing as ECF No. #38 . See Court's Order at ECF No. #39 . Rejected document was returned to the filer. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rmc) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/2/2019: #1 Rejected Document) (rmc). [Transferred from California Southern on 1/20/2021.] |
|
Filing 39
ORDER Granting #38 Joint Motion for Protective Order with Modifications. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda Lopez on 7/2/2019. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rmc) [Transferred from California Southern on 1/20/2021.]
|
| Filing 38 Joint MOTION for Protective Order by Dustin Lloyd. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Moran, Kelly) (rmc). [Transferred from California Southern on 1/20/2021.] |
|
Filing 37
SCHEDULING ORDER Regulating Discovery and Other Pre-Trial Proceedings. A Mandatory Settlement Conference will be conducted on 6/1/2020 at 1:30 P.M. in the chambers of Magistrate Judge Linda Lopez. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda Lopez on 6/11/2019.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rmc) [Transferred from California Southern on 1/20/2021.]
|
| Filing 36 Minute Order for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Linda Lopez:An Early Neutral Evaluation Conference was held on 6/10/2019. Case did not settle. A Case Management Conference was held on 6/10/2019. Order to issue. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(no document attached) (asm) [Transferred from California Southern on 1/20/2021.] |
| Filing 35 Joint Discovery Plan by Dustin Lloyd. (Moran, Kelly) Modified on 5/31/2019 to correct text, add required restriction, QC mail sent re event (rmc). [Transferred from California Southern on 1/20/2021.] |
|
Filing 34
NOTICE AND ORDER for Early Neutral Evaluation Conference and Case Management Conference. An Early Neutral Evaluation will be held on 6/10/2019 at 9:30 a.m. in the chambers of the Honorable Linda Lopez. In the event the case does not settle during the ENE, the Court will conduct an Initial Case Management Conference. File a Joint Discovery Plan on the CM/ECF system no later than 5/31/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda Lopez on 5/2/2019.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rmc) [Transferred from California Southern on 1/20/2021.]
|
|
Filing 33
ORDER Granting #28 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. The Court grants Defendants' motion and dismisses Plaintiff's claims against the members of the Riverside County Board of Supervisors, the Riverside County Sheriff, and the District Attorney. Dismissal of these claims is with prejudice. The Court directs the Clerk of Court to terminate this action as to these Defendants. This action will proceed against Defendant Dustin Lloyd only. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 4/25/2019. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rmc) [Transferred from California Southern on 1/20/2021.]
|
|
Filing 32
Minute Order Taking Motion Under Submission: Defendants Riverside County Supervisors Kevin Jeffries, John Tavaglione, Chuck Washington, Marion Ashley, and V. Manuel Perez; Riverside County Sheriff Stanley Sniff, Jr.; and Riverside District Attorney Michael Hestrin, have filed a #28 motion to dismiss Plaintiff's amended claims, currently set for hearing on April 8, 2019. The Court in its discretion takes the motion under submission without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b). Accordingly, no appearances are required and the previously scheduled hearing will be taken off calendar. SO ORDERED by Judge Michael M. Anello on 4/2/2019. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (no document attached) (amk) [Transferred from California Southern on 1/20/2021.]
|
| Filing 31 REPLY - Other re #29 Answer to Amended Complaint filed by Jane Doe. Nunc Pro Tunc 2/22/2019. (rmc) [Transferred from California Southern on 1/20/2021.] |
| Filing 30 Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by the Chambers of Judge Michael M. Anello Accepting Document: Reply to Answer by Defendant Officer Dustin Lloyd, AKA Justin Lloyd, from Plaintiff Jane Doe. Non-compliance with local rule(s), Supplemental documents require court order. Nunc Pro Tunc 2/22/2019. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rmc) [Transferred from California Southern on 1/20/2021.] |
| Filing 29 ANSWER to #26 Amended Complaint by Dustin Lloyd.(Moran, Kelly) (rmc). [Transferred from California Southern on 1/20/2021.] |
| Filing 28 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Plaintiff's First Amended Compliant by Marion Ashley, Michael Hestrin, Kevin Jeffries, V. Manuel Perez, Stan Sniff, John Tavaglione, Chuck Washington. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities, #2 Proof of Service, #3 Proposed Order)(Moran, Kelly)Attorney Kelly Anne Moran added to party Michael Hestrin(pty:dft), Attorney Kelly Anne Moran added to party Kevin Jeffries(pty:dft), Attorney Kelly Anne Moran added to party V. Manuel Perez(pty:dft), Attorney Kelly Anne Moran added to party John Tavaglione(pty:dft) Modified to correct event on 2/15/2019, QC mail sent re e-filed proposed order, non-attorney e-signature in proof of service (rmc). [Transferred from California Southern on 1/20/2021.] |
| Filing 27 Amended Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiffs not receiving notice electronically. (rmc) [Transferred from California Southern on 1/20/2021.] |
| Filing 26 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Kevin Jeffries, John Tavaglione, Chuck Washington, V. Manuel Perez, Marion Ashley, Stan Sniff, Michael Hestrin, Dustin Lloyd, Riverside County, filed by Jane Doe. New Summons Requested. (rmc) [Transferred from California Southern on 1/20/2021.] |
| Filing 25 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re #24 Order Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment; Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Mail sent to Jane Doe. (rmc) [Transferred from California Southern on 1/20/2021.] |
|
Filing 24
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. No. #16 ); Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. #18 ). The Court dismisses Plaintiff's claims against the members of the Riverside County Board of Supervisors, the Riverside County Sheriff, and the District Attorney. Dismissal of these claims is without prejudice and with leave to amend. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 12/27/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jdt) [Transferred from California Southern on 1/20/2021.]
|
| Filing 23 REPLY to Response to Motion re #18 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Marion Ashley, Michael Helstrin, Kevin Jefferies, Dustin Lloyd, Manuel Perez, Stan Sniff, JF Tavaglione, Chuck Washington. (Moran, Kelly) Courtesy QC mail sent re unsigned documents (rmc). [Transferred from California Southern on 1/20/2021.] |
|
Filing 22
Minute Order Setting Deadline for Optional Reply Brief: In light of Plaintiff's late-filed response in opposition to Defendants' #18 motion to dismiss, Defendants may file a reply brief in support of their pending motion on or before December 14, 2018. SO ORDERED by Judge Michael M. Anello on 12/7/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(no document attached) (amk) [Transferred from California Southern on 1/20/2021.]
|
| Filing 21 RESPONSE in Opposition re #18 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Jane Doe. Nunc Pro Tunc 12/6/2018. (rmc) [Transferred from California Southern on 1/20/2021.] |
| Filing 20 Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by the Chambers of Judge Michael M. Anello Accepting Document: Memo of Points and Authorities in support of Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants Motion for Dismissal, from Plaintiff Jane Doe. Non-compliance with local rule(s), Civ. L. Rule 7.1: Documents are not timely. Nunc Pro Tunc 12/6/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rmc) [Transferred from California Southern on 1/20/2021.] |
|
Filing 19
ORDER Taking Motions Under Submission Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1.; Vacating Motion Hearing; Denying as Moot #17 Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order. The Court has undertaken an initial review of the parties' submissions. The Court finds the motions suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument. Accordingly, the Court vacates the previously scheduled motion hearing and denies as moot Plaintiff's motion for a protective order, in which she requests a closed hearing on the motions. The parties are instructed not to appear. The Court will issue a written ruling in due course. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 12/3/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rmc) Modified to add missing title text on 12/3/2018 (rmc). [Transferred from California Southern on 1/20/2021.]
|
| Filing 18 MOTION to Dismiss by Marion Ashley, Michael Helstrin, Kevin Jefferies, Dustin Lloyd, Manuel Perez, Stan Sniff, JF Tavaglione, Chuck Washington. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Proof of Service)(Moran, Kelly)Attorney Kelly Anne Moran added to party Marion Ashley(pty:dft), Attorney Kelly Anne Moran added to party Michael Helstrin(pty:dft), Attorney Kelly Anne Moran added to party Kevin Jefferies(pty:dft), Attorney Kelly Anne Moran added to party Dustin Lloyd (pty:dft), Attorney Kelly Anne Moran added to party Manuel Perez(pty:dft), Attorney Kelly Anne Moran added to party Stan Sniff(pty:dft), Attorney Kelly Anne Moran added to party JF Tavaglione(pty:dft), Attorney Kelly Anne Moran added to party Chuck Washington(pty:dft) Courtesy QC mail sent re unsigned documents, e-filed proposed order (rmc). [Transferred from California Southern on 1/20/2021.] |
| Filing 17 MOTION for Protective Order by Jane Doe. Nunc Pro Tunc 11/7/2018. (rmc) [Transferred from California Southern on 1/20/2021.] |
| Filing 16 MOTION for Default Judgment by Jane Doe. Nunc Pro Tunc 11/7/2018. (rmc) [Transferred from California Southern on 1/20/2021.] |
| Filing 15 Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by the Chambers of Judge Michael M. Anello Accepting Document: Request for protective order and closed hearing, from Plaintiff Jane Doe. Non-compliance with local rule(s), Civ. L. Rule 7.1: Lacking memorandum of points and authorities in support as a separate document, Civ.L. Rule 5.2: Missing Proof of Service. Nunc Pro Tunc 11/7/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rmc) [Transferred from California Southern on 1/20/2021.] |
| Filing 14 Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by the Chambers of Judge Michael M. Anello Accepting Document: Motion for enter default of judgment, from Plaintiff Jane Doe. Non-compliance with local rule(s), Civ. L. Rule 7.1: Lacking memorandum of points and authorities in support as a separate document, Civ.L. Rule 5.2: Missing Proof of Service; OTHER: Answer due 11/9/2018. Nunc Pro Tunc 11/7/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rmc) [Transferred from California Southern on 1/20/2021.] |
| Filing 13 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re #12 Order of Judge Transfer, #9 Order Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment and Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Settlement Date and Judgment. Mail sent to Jane Doe. (Attachments: #1 Additional Mail Returned Undeliverable) (rmc) [Transferred from California Southern on 1/20/2021.] |
|
Filing 12
ORDER OF TRANSFER. This case is transferred from the calendar of the Honorable Jan M. Adler, to the calendar of the Honorable Linda Lopez for all further proceedings. All conferences or hearing dates previously set before Judge Adler will remain as scheduled and will be before Judge Lopez. Any dates set before any district judge remain unchanged. The new case number is 18cv2021-MMA(LL). Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major on 10/29/2018.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rmc) [Transferred from California Southern on 1/20/2021.]
|
| Filing 11 Amended SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jane Doe. Kevin Jefferies served. (rmc) [Transferred from California Southern on 1/20/2021.] |
| Filing 10 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re #6 Notice and Order of Document Discrepancies. Mail sent to Jane Doe. (rmc) [Transferred from California Southern on 1/20/2021.] |
|
Filing 9
ORDER Denying #5 Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment; Denying #7 Plaintiff's Motion for Settlement Date and Judgment. The Court denies Plaintiff's motion for default judgment without prejudice. In light of the current procedural posture of the case, the Court also denies Plaintiff's motion for a settlement conference and judgment. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 10/17/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rmc) [Transferred from California Southern on 1/20/2021.]
|
| Filing 8 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re #4 Notice and Order of Document Discrepancies. Mail sent to Jane Doe. (rmc) [Transferred from California Southern on 1/20/2021.] |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Settlement Date, MOTION for Judgment of 1.3M Dollars by Jane Doe. Nunc Pro Tunc 10/9/2018. (rmc) [Transferred from California Southern on 1/20/2021.] |
| Filing 6 Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by the Chambers of Judge Michael M. Anello Accepting Document: Request for Settlement Date and Judgment of 1.3M Dollars, from Plaintiff Jane Doe. Non-compliance with local rule(s), Civ. L. Rule 5.1: Missing time and date on motion and/or supporting documentation, Civ. L. Rule 7.1: Lacking memorandum of points and authorities in support as a separate document, Civ.L. Rule 5.2: Missing Proof of Service. Nunc Pro Tunc 10/9/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rmc) [Transferred from California Southern on 1/20/2021.] |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Default Judgment against Defendants by Jane Doe. Nunc Pro Tunc 10/2/2018. (rmc) [Transferred from California Southern on 1/20/2021.] |
| Filing 4 Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by the Chambers of Judge Michael M. Anello Accepting Document: Motion to Enter Default Judgment Pursuant to R. 55, from Plaintiff Jane Doe. Non-compliance with local rule(s), Civ. L. Rule 5.1: Missing time and date on motion and/or supporting documentation, Civ. L.R. 55.1: Clerk's Default must be entered prior to Motion for Default Judgment. Nunc Pro Tunc 10/2/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rmc) [Transferred from California Southern on 1/20/2021.] |
| Filing 3 Amended Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. Summons has been provided to plaintiffs not receiving notice electronically. (mtr) (mdc) [Transferred from California Southern on 1/20/2021.] |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. Summons has been provided to plaintiffs not receiving notice electronically. (jrm) (jao). [Transferred from California Southern on 1/20/2021.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Does 1-50, Michael Helstvin, Kevin Jefferies, Dustin Lloyd, Manuel Perez, Stan Sniff, JF Tavaglione, Chuck Washington ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number CAS103756.), filed by Jane Doe. (Attachments: #1 civil cover sheet)The new case number is 3:18-cv-02021-MMA-JMA. Judge Michael M. Anello and Magistrate Judge Jan M. Adler are assigned to the case. (Doe, Jane)(jrm) (jao). [Transferred from California Southern on 1/20/2021.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
