In re Debtor David Carl Goad
| Rod Danielson and United States Trustee (RS) |
| David Carl Goad |
| 5:2021cv00172 |
| January 25, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John F Walter |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
SELF-REPRESENTATION ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. (iv)
|
|
Filing 6
STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. (iv)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE REGARDING APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT. The appeal has been assigned to Judge John F. Walter. Refer to the Notice for specifics. (jtil) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Transfer of Appeal to District Court. (jtil) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REFERRAL OF APPEAL (ADVERSARY) prepared by the United States Bankruptcy Court on 1/25/2021. (jtil) |
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF APPEAL: filed by Appellant David Carl Goad Re: Order Denying Motion to Reconsider Dismissal entered on 1/25/2021 by Bankruptcy Judge Wayne E. Johnson, filed in the Bankruptcy Court on 1/25/2021. Bankruptcy Court case number: 6:20-bk-16683-WJ, Adversary number: N/A, BAP case number: CC-21-1011. #1 BK Docket) (jtil).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
