Haiyan Zhao v. Raymond Grant Parkman
Haiyan Zhao |
Raymond Grant Parkman |
5:2021cv00187 |
February 1, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John W Holcomb |
Sheri Pym |
Real Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Receipt of Acknowledgement of the documents by Superior Court of California Riverside County, case no. SWS2000501. (lom) |
Filing 8 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Riverside County Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Riverside County Superior Court - Small Claims Division. Case number: SWS2000501. (jp) |
Filing 7 ORDER REMANDING CASE by Judge John W. Holcomb, this Court does not have diversity subject matter jurisdiction over this case. Accordingly, in the absence of jurisdiction, the Court must sua sponte REMAND this action to the Riverside County Superior Court. see document for further information. (Made JS-6Case Terminated.) (jp) |
Filing 6 SELF-REPRESENTATION ORDER by Judge John W. Holcomb. (iva) |
Filing 5 Text Only Entry - IN CHAMBERS by Judge John W. Holcomb: Notice Regarding Electronic Document Submission System for People Without Lawyers. People who are not represented by attorneys may now submit documents for filing through the Court's Electronic Document Submission System ("EDSS") instead of mailing or bringing documents to the Clerk's Office. EDSS is not the same as filing documents electronically in the Court's CM/ECF System. Registration is not required to use EDSS and you do not need a PACER account; only internet access and an e-mail address are required. Attorneys may not use EDSS to submit documents on behalf of their clients. To access EDSS and for additional information, visit the Court's website at https://apps.cacd.uscourts.gov/edss. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (iva) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 4 STANDING ORDER by Judge John W. Holcomb. (iva) |
Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John W. Holcomb and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (esa) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California Riverside County, case number SWS 200501 with copy of SMALL CLAIMS COMPLAINT (filed in state court 3/18/20, see part 2, p. 175).Case assigned to Judge John W. Holcomb, discovery to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. Filing fee $402 paid, filed by defendant Raymond Grant Parkman. (Attachments: #1 part 2, #2 civil cover sheet) (esa) Modified on 2/2/2021 (esa). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Haiyan Zhao v. Raymond Grant Parkman | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Raymond Grant Parkman | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Haiyan Zhao | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.