Oscar Rafael Sanchez v. T. Cisneros
| Oscar Rafael Sanchez |
| T. Cisneros |
| 5:2021cv00316 |
| February 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| James V Selna |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Vincent P LaPietra on behalf of Respondent T. Cisneros (LaPietra, Vincent) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Vincent P LaPietra on behalf of Respondent T. Cisneros (LaPietra, Vincent) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Vincent P LaPietra on behalf of Respondent T. Cisneros (Attorney Vincent P LaPietra added to party T. Cisneros(pty:res))(LaPietra, Vincent) |
Filing 4
ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE TO PETITION by Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth: Respondent shall e-file and serve a Notice of Appearance that designates the Deputy Attorney General(s) in charge of the case within fourteen (14) days of the service date of this Order. Respondent shall file a Motion to Dismiss within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Respondent shall file and serve an Answer to Petition within forty-five (45) days of the date of this Order. Petitioner may file a single Reply responding to matters raised in the Answer within thirty (30) days of the date of service thereof. Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Petition) (kh)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge James V. Selna and referred to Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (car) |
| Filing 2 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT to Proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge Declined, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636c filed by Petitioner Oscar Rafael Sanchez. The Petitioner does not consent. (car) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254) Case assigned to Judge James V. Selna and referred to Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth.(Filing fee $ 5. FEE DUE), filed by Petitioner Oscar Rafael Sanchez. (car) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Oscar Rafael Sanchez v. T. Cisneros | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Oscar Rafael Sanchez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: T. Cisneros | |
| Represented By: | Vincent P LaPietra |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
