Oscar Rafael Sanchez v. T. Cisneros
Petitioner: Oscar Rafael Sanchez
Respondent: T. Cisneros
Case Number: 5:2021cv00316
Filed: February 17, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: James V Selna
Referring Judge: Autumn D Spaeth
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 13, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Vincent P LaPietra on behalf of Respondent T. Cisneros (LaPietra, Vincent)
April 13, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Vincent P LaPietra on behalf of Respondent T. Cisneros (LaPietra, Vincent)
April 13, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Vincent P LaPietra on behalf of Respondent T. Cisneros (Attorney Vincent P LaPietra added to party T. Cisneros(pty:res))(LaPietra, Vincent)
April 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE TO PETITION by Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth: Respondent shall e-file and serve a Notice of Appearance that designates the Deputy Attorney General(s) in charge of the case within fourteen (14) days of the service date of this Order. Respondent shall file a Motion to Dismiss within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Respondent shall file and serve an Answer to Petition within forty-five (45) days of the date of this Order. Petitioner may file a single Reply responding to matters raised in the Answer within thirty (30) days of the date of service thereof. Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Petition) (kh)
February 24, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge James V. Selna and referred to Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (car)
February 17, 2021 Filing 2 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT to Proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge Declined, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636c filed by Petitioner Oscar Rafael Sanchez. The Petitioner does not consent. (car)
February 17, 2021 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254) Case assigned to Judge James V. Selna and referred to Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth.(Filing fee $ 5. FEE DUE), filed by Petitioner Oscar Rafael Sanchez. (car)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Oscar Rafael Sanchez v. T. Cisneros
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Oscar Rafael Sanchez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: T. Cisneros
Represented By: Vincent P LaPietra
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?