Tanya R. Vodicka v. Andrew Saul
| TANYA R. VODICKA |
| Commissioner of Soci Andrew Saul and Andrew Saul |
| 5:2021cv00377 |
| March 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth for all further proceedings. Please use the case number EDCV21-377 JPR on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (sn) |
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Tanya R. Vodicka, upon Defendant Andrew Saul served on 3/16/2021, answer due 5/17/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to C. VELOZ. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to CLERK. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to CIVIL PROCESS CLERK. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons returned. (Panutich, Alex) |
| Filing 13 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by PLAINTIFF Tanya R. Vodicka. (Panutich, Alex) |
| Filing 12 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Andrew Saul. (Attorney Ellinor R Coder added to party Andrew Saul(pty:dft))(Coder, Ellinor) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE IN RESPONSE TO THE MARCH 8, 2021 MINUTE ORDER RE POSSIBLE CONFLITCTS OF INTEREST filed by PLAINTIFF Tanya R. Vodicka. (Panutich, Alex) |
| Filing 10 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Andrew Saul. (es) |
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) Order re Possible Conflicts of Interest by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth: No later than seven days from the date of this order, Plaintiffs counsel must file notice that ALJ Rosenbluth did or did not participate in or preside over Plaintiff's case. (See document for details.) (es)
|
|
Filing 8
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. [See document for details.] (es)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth: Granting #5 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (es)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and referred to Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (esa) |
| Filing 5 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by PLAINTIFF TANYA R. VODICKA. (Panutich, Alex) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by PLAINTIFF TANYA R. VODICKA, (Panutich, Alex) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by PLAINTIFF TANYA R. VODICKA. (Panutich, Alex) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff TANYA R. VODICKA. (Panutich, Alex) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by PLAINTIFF TANYA R. VODICKA. (Attorney Alex Panutich added to party TANYA R. VODICKA(pty:pla))(Panutich, Alex) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
