Yolanda Ramirez v. Andrew Saul
| Yolanda Ramirez |
| Andrew Saul |
| 5:2021cv00405 |
| March 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Karen L Stevenson |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER LIFTING STAY AND DIRECTING COMMISSIONER TO FILE NOTICE OF SERVICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD NO LATER THAN AUGUST 13, 2021 by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the stay issued in this matter pursuant to Order 20-074 is LIFTED and, no later than August 13, 2021, the Commissioner shall both serve Plaintiff with the Administrative Record and file with the Court a Notice of Service of the Certified Administrative Record. (see document for further details) (hr)
|
|
Filing 17
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER NOTIFYING PARTIES OF STAY AND ORDERING DEFENDANT TO NOTIFY PARTIES AND COURT OF THE DATE THE COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY RESUMES OPERATIONS by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson: On April 17, 2020, Order 20-0741 of the Chief Judge of the United States District Courtfor the Central District of California STAYED this case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if this case remains stayed up until the date that the Commissioner of Social Security resumes operations, then, within seven (7) days of the date that operations are resumed, Defendant shall notify the Court and the parties that the Commissioner has resumed operations. (et)
|
| Filing 16 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson for all further proceedings. Please use the case number EDCV21-405 KS on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (sn) |
| Filing 15 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Andrew Saul. (Attorney Marla K. Letellier added to party Andrew Saul(pty:dft))(Letellier, Marla) |
| Filing 14 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Plaintiff Yolanda Ramirez. (Kalagian, Marc) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Yolanda Ramirez, upon Defendant Andrew Saul served on 3/31/2021, answer due 6/1/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were Service was executed in compliance with statute not specified. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Kalagian, Marc) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER RE: PROCEDURES IN SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL (JOINT SUBMISSION FORMAT) by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (see document for details) (hr)
|
| Filing 11 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Andrew Saul. (hr) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson: granting #5 APPLICATION to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (hr)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE by Judge David O. Carter. Counsel shall disregard the Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint #8 as this document was issued in the incorrect case number. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kd) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 8 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER. (kd) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (et) |
| Filing 6 EXHIBIT Filed filed by Plaintiff Yolanda Ramirez. as to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . (Kalagian, Marc) |
| Filing 5 APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Yolanda Ramirez. (Kalagian, Marc) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Yolanda Ramirez, (Kalagian, Marc) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Yolanda Ramirez. (Kalagian, Marc) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Yolanda Ramirez. (Kalagian, Marc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Yolanda Ramirez. (Attorney Marc V Kalagian added to party Yolanda Ramirez(pty:pla))(Kalagian, Marc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Yolanda Ramirez v. Andrew Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew Saul | |
| Represented By: | Marla K. Letellier |
| Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA |
| Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-CV |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Yolanda Ramirez | |
| Represented By: | Marc V Kalagian |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
