James Andrews et al v. Book VIP Marketing Inc..
James Andrews and Carmen Andrews |
BOOK VIP MARKETING INC. and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and each of them |
5:2021cv00411 |
March 8, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John W Holcomb |
Shashi H Kewalramani |
Other Statutory Actions |
47 U.S.C. ยง 0227 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 STANDING ORDER by Judge John W. Holcomb. (iva) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Book VIP Marketing Inc. (jtil) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John W. Holcomb and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (jtil) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs All Plaintiffs, identifying BOOK VIP MARKETING INC.. (Friedman, Todd) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Carmen Andrews, James Andrews. (Friedman, Todd) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Carmen Andrews, James Andrews. (Friedman, Todd) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-30871869 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiffs James Andrews, Carmen Andrews. (Attorney Todd M Friedman added to party Carmen Andrews(pty:pla), Attorney Todd M Friedman added to party James Andrews(pty:pla))(Friedman, Todd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.