Carlos Torres v. City of San Bernardino et al
Carlos Torres |
Does 1-10, inclusive, City of San Bernardino, Martin Hysen and Irman Ahmed |
5:2021cv00454 |
March 15, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John W Holcomb |
Kenly Kiya Kato |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendants Irman Ahmed, City of San Bernardino, Martin Hysen.(Attorney Aamir Raza added to party Irman Ahmed(pty:dft), Attorney Aamir Raza added to party City of San Bernardino(pty:dft), Attorney Aamir Raza added to party Martin Hysen(pty:dft))(Raza, Aamir) |
Filing 13 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Miscellaneous Document #11 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Stipulation---->Extending time to answer. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (yl) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Irman Ahmed, City of San Bernardino, Martin Hysen, (Attorney Paul B Beach added to party Irman Ahmed(pty:dft), Attorney Paul B Beach added to party City of San Bernardino(pty:dft), Attorney Paul B Beach added to party Martin Hysen(pty:dft))(Beach, Paul) |
Filing 11 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT BY NOT MORE THAN 30 DAYS (L.R. 8-3) filed by Defendants Irman Ahmed, City of San Bernardino, Martin Hysen re: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 (Raza, Aamir) |
Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Carlos Torres, upon Defendant Irman Ahmed served on 4/7/2021, answer due 4/28/2021; City of San Bernardino served on 4/5/2021, answer due 4/26/2021; Martin Hysen served on 4/7/2021, answer due 4/28/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon person authorized to accept service in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Galipo, Dale) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Association of Counsel associating attorney Olivier A. Taillieu on behalf of Plaintiff Carlos Torres. Filed by Plaintiff Carlos Torres (Attorney Olivier A Taillieu added to party Carlos Torres(pty:pla))(Taillieu, Olivier) |
Filing 8 STANDING ORDER by Judge John W. Holcomb. (iva) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Irman Ahmed, City of San Bernardino, Martin Hysen. (ghap) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John W. Holcomb and Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (ghap) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Carlos Torres. (Sincich, Marcel) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Carlos Torres, (Sincich, Marcel) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Carlos Torres. (Sincich, Marcel) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-30916062 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Carlos Torres. (Attorney Marcel F Sincich added to party Carlos Torres(pty:pla))(Sincich, Marcel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.