Marcos Miguel Rangel v. California Rehabilation Center
Plaintiff: Marcos Miguel Rangel
Defendant: California Rehabilation Center, Cynthia Tampkins and Glen E. Pratt
Case Number: 5:2021cv00466
Filed: March 16, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Office: Eastern Division - Riverside Office
Presiding Judge: Dolly M Gee
Referring Judge: Alexander F MacKinnon
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 11, 2021 Filing 19 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION issued by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. IT THEREFORE IS RECOMMENDED that the District Judge issue an Order: (1) accepting and adopting this Report and Recommendation; (2) dismissing the First Amended Complaint without further leave to amend; and (3) directing that judgment be entered dismissing this action with prejudice for failure to state a claim. (es)
May 11, 2021 Filing 18 NOTICE OF FILING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. Objections to R&R due by 6/1/2021. (es)
May 4, 2021 Filing 17 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon re Plaintiff's #15 REQUEST: The Court has reviewed plaintiff's undated letter which was docketed on 4/16/21. Plaintiff shall refrain from writing letters to the Court; all matters must be called to a judge's attention by appropriate application or motion filed in compliance with the Local Rules. See L.R. 83-2.5. Further letters to the Court will be rejected and returned. Plaintiff is referred to the Court's prior 4/16/21 minute order that responds to plaintiff's requests. Plaintiff is advised that the Court is presently screening the First Amended Complaint #16 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Until the FAC has been screened and the Court has ordered that service of process may occur, plaintiff may not proceed with service of process upon defendant. (See document for further details). (ib)
April 29, 2021 Filing 16 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Cynthia Tampkins, Cynthia Tampkins, Glen E. Pratt, Glen E. Pratt; Party California Rehabilation Center terminated amending Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights) #1 , filed by plaintiff Marcos Miguel Rangel(es)
April 16, 2021 Filing 15 REQUESTS filed by plaintiff Marcos Miguel Rangel. (es)
April 16, 2021 Filing 14 MINUTES (In Chambers): (1) Letters from Plaintiff (Dated March 24, 2021, March 31, 2021, April 6, 2021); (2) Extension of Time to File a First Amended Complaint by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon: The Court extends plaintiffs deadline to file a First Amended Complaint to May 31, 2021. On the Court's own motion, plaintiff shall have until May 25, 2021 to pay the initial partial filing fee of $1.86. Failure to remit the initial partial filing fee may result in dismissal of the case. [See document for details.] (es)
April 9, 2021 Filing 13 Letter from Marcus Miguel Rangel (es)
April 6, 2021 Filing 12 Letter With Change of address Changing plaintiffs address to NKSP C-2-A 122 Low P O Box 5004 Delano CA 93216-5004. Filed by Plaintiff Marcos Miguel Rangel. (es)
April 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 NOTICE OF DOCUMENT DISCREPANCIES AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon ORDERING No title - Letter with Change of Address submitted by Plaintiff Marcos Miguel Rangel received on April 6, 2021 to be filed and processed; filed date to be the date the document was stamped Received but not Filed with the Clerk. (es)
March 30, 2021 Filing 10 NOTICE filed by plaintiff Marcos Miguel Rangel. (es)
March 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. If plaintiff still desires to pursue this action, he is ORDERED to file a First Amended Complaint no later than thirty (30) days after the date of this Order, remedying the pleading deficiencies discussed above. [See document for details.] (Attachments: #1 Attach.1 CV-66, #2 Attach.2 CV-09) (es)
March 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER RE CIVIL RIGHTS CASE by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (es)
March 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon: Granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma re MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #2 . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1915, the prisoner-plaintiff owes the Court the total filing fee of $350.00. An initial partial filing fee of $1.86 must be paid within thirty (30) days of the date this order is filed. Failure to remit the initial partial filing fee may result in dismissal of the case. Thereafter, monthly payments shall be forwarded to the Court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2). (es)
March 18, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and referred to Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (car)
March 18, 2021 Filing 5 ORIGINAL file, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received from California Eastern
March 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/16/2021 ORDERING CASE TRANSFERRED to the Eastern Division of the United States District Court for the Central District of California. (Henshaw, R) [Transferred from California Eastern on 3/18/2021.]
March 16, 2021 SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order served on Marcos Miguel Rangel. (Henshaw, R) [Transferred from California Eastern on 3/18/2021.]
March 9, 2021 Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 4/12/2021 (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Becknal, R) [Transferred from California Eastern on 3/18/2021.]
March 9, 2021 SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents served on Marcos Miguel Rangel. (Becknal, R) [Transferred from California Eastern on 3/18/2021.]
March 8, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Marcos Miguel Rangel. (Becknal, R) [Transferred from California Eastern on 3/18/2021.] Modified on 3/18/2021 (car).
March 8, 2021 Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT by Marcos Miguel Rangel.(Becknal, R) [Transferred from California Eastern on 3/18/2021.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Marcos Miguel Rangel v. California Rehabilation Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: California Rehabilation Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cynthia Tampkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Glen E. Pratt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marcos Miguel Rangel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?