Joe Montgomery v. Gigi Matteson
Petitioner: Joe Montgomery
Respondent: Gigi Matteson
Case Number: 5:2021cv00501
Filed: March 19, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Percy Anderson
Referring Judge: Alexander F MacKinnon
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR A STAY #2 by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon: Petitioner shall file a status report informing the Court about the progress of his effort to exhaust his state remedies within thirty (30) days of the date of service of this Order. [See document for details.] (es)
April 26, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re Reply (Motion related) #6 (Attachments: #1 Lodgment 1, #2 Lodgment 2, #3 Lodgment 3, #4 Lodgment 4)(Beesley, Christopher)
April 26, 2021 Filing 6 REPLY Opposition REQUEST to Stay Case pending Exhaustion of Claims #2 filed by Respondent Gigi Matteson. (Beesley, Christopher)
April 19, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Christopher P Beesley on behalf of Respondent Gigi Matteson (Attorney Christopher P Beesley added to party Gigi Matteson(pty:res))(Beesley, Christopher)
March 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR STAY by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, Respondent shall file and serve an opposition or statement of non-opposition to Petitioner's request for a stay. Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Attachment.Petition, #2 Attachment.Request for Stay) (es)
March 24, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Percy Anderson and referred to Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (Attachments: #1 CV111/CV69P) (jtil)
March 24, 2021 Filing 2 REQUEST to Stay and Abey pending Exhaustion of Claims filed by Petitioner Joe Montgomery. (jtil)
March 19, 2021 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254), filed by Petitioner Joe Montgomery. Case assigned to Judge Percy Anderson and referred to Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (jtil)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Joe Montgomery v. Gigi Matteson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Gigi Matteson
Represented By: Christopher P Beesley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Joe Montgomery
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?