Shauntez Kuioun Rockemore v. Correctional Officer V. Aguirre et al
| Shauntez Kuioun Rockemore |
| Correctional Officer V. Aguirre, Correctional Officer Marth Vazquez, R. Allen, Correctional Officer L. Castellanos, C. Fortson, II and Correctional Officer R. Gutierez |
| 5:2021cv00550 |
| March 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Virginia A Phillips |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER: by Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth, ORDERING Letter submitted by Plaintiff Shauntez Kuioun Rockemore, received on May 11, 2021, is not to be filed but instead rejected. Denial based on: Local Rule 83-2.5: No letters to the judge. All matters must be called to a judge's attention by appropriate application or motion. (hr)
|
| Filing 9 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants V. Aguirre, R. Allen(Correctional Lieutenant, official capacity), R. Allen(Correctional Lieutenant, individual), L. Castellanos, C. Fortson, II, R. Gutierez, Marth Vazquez amending Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights) #1 , filed by Plaintiff Shauntez Kuioun Rockemore(hr) |
| Filing 8 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Shauntez Kuioun Rockemore. (hr) |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE to Order to Show Cause #6 filed by Plaintiff Shauntez Kuioun Rockemore (hr) |
|
Filing 6
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL by Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. By no later than May 14, 2021, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute the Complaint and follow court orders. Plaintiff may respond to this Order by (1) paying the full $402.00 filing fees or (2) filing a complete IFP Request along with a signed authorization for account disbursements to pay the filing fees and a signed certification by an authorized prison official. (see document for further details) (Attachments: #1 Blank IFP Request, #2 Blank form Notice of Dismissal) (et)
|
| Filing 5 LETTER from Plaintiff Shauntez Kuioun Rockemore (hr) |
|
Filing 4
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER REGARDING FAILURE TO PAY FEES OR FILE COMPLETE IFP REQUEST by Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed with this lawsuit, he must either (1) pay the full $402.00 filing fees, (2) file a complete IFP Request along with the necessary accompanying documents, an authorization for disbursement of funds, and a copy of his prison trust fund account statement that is certified by an authorized officer, or (3) show cause why he is unable to do so by no later than April 16, 2021. (Attachments: #1 Blank IFP Request Form) (hr)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Virginia A. Phillips and referred to Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (lh) |
| Filing 2 CDCR Inmate Statement Report, filed by Plaintiff Shauntez Kuioun Rockemore. (lh) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants V. Aguirre, R. Allen(Correctional Lieutenant, official capacity), R. Allen(Correctional Lieutenant, individual), L. Castellanos, C. Fortson, II, R. Gutierez, Marth Vazquez pursuant to 42:1983. Case assigned to Judge Virginia A. Phillips and referred to Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. Filed by Plaintiff Shauntez Kuioun Rockemore. (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
