Frank Singh v. T.J. Maxx of CA, LLC et al
Frank Singh |
T.J. Maxx of CA, LLC doing business as T.J. Maxx & Homegoods, Sy Ventures III, LLC, Does 1-50, Inclusive and T.J. Maxx of CA, LLC as an entity doing business as T.J. Maxx and Homegoods |
5:2021cv00552 |
March 30, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Kenly Kiya Kato |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Sy Ventures III, LLC, T.J. Maxx of CA, LLC. (et) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (Attachments: #1 CV11C Statement of Consent) (et) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Frank Singh. (Malakauskas, Daniel) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Frank Singh, (Malakauskas, Daniel) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Frank Singh. (Malakauskas, Daniel) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31012813 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Frank Singh. (Attorney Daniel Joseph Malakauskas added to party Frank Singh(pty:pla))(Malakauskas, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.