Bryan Estrada v. Chino Auto Upholstery et al
| Bryan Estrada |
| Chino Auto Upholstery, Does 1-10, inclusive and Anthony P. Vernola |
| 5:2021cv00643 |
| April 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John W Holcomb |
| Sheri Pym |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
SCHEDULING NOTICE AND ORDER by Judge John W. Holcomb: In light of the Notice of Settlement filed May 28, 2021 [ECF No. #12 ], indicating that the case has settled, this action is placed in inactive status. By June 29, 2021, the parties shall file either (1) a Stipulation of Dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); (2) a Stipulation for an Order of Dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2); or (3) a motion to reopen if settlement has not been consummated. Upon the failure to comply with this Order in a timely manner, this action shall be deemed dismissed as of June 30, 2021. This Court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party. All previously set deadlines and dates are hereby VACATED. (JS-6) THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (iva) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Settlement filed by plaintiff Bryan Estrada. (Cornell, Ross) |
| Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Chino Auto Upholstery answer now due 6/3/2021, filed by Defendant Chino Auto Upholstery.(Attorney Rex T Reeves added to party Chino Auto Upholstery(pty:dft))(Reeves, Rex) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Bryan Estrada, upon Defendant Chino Auto Upholstery served on 4/12/2021, answer due 5/3/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Chino Auto Upholstery by Robert Gomez, incharge in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and no service by mail was executed.Original Summons NOT returned. (Cornell, Ross) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Bryan Estrada, upon Defendant Anthony P. Vernola served on 4/12/2021, answer due 5/3/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Anthony P. Vernola by Marvin Doe, Occupant in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Cornell, Ross) |
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER by Judge John W. Holcomb. (iva)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Chino Auto Upholstery, Anthony P. Vernola. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John W. Holcomb and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (et) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Bryan Estrada. (Cornell, Ross) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Bryan Estrada, (Cornell, Ross) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Bryan Estrada. (Cornell, Ross) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31088184 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Bryan Estrada. (Attorney Ross Cornell added to party Bryan Estrada(pty:pla))(Cornell, Ross) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
