Henry Frederick Ramey v. Hector Pena Gomez et al
| Henry Frederick Ramey, Jr |
| Fast Eviction Service, Does 1-10, Hector Pena Gomez, M. C. Earle and Superior Court of the State of California |
| 5:2021cv00694 |
| April 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F Eick |
| James V Selna |
| Civil Rights: Accommodations |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER by Judge James V. Selna: denying #2 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60) This case is hereby REMANDED to state court. MD JS-6, Case Terminated. (es) Modified on 4/29/2021 (es).
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and referred to Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (ghap) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Henry Frederick Ramey, Jr. (ghap) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Henry Frederick Ramey, Jr. (ghap) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed against Defendants Does 1-10, M. C. Earle, Fast Eviction Service, Hector Pena Gomez, Superior Court of the State of California Case assigned to Judge James V. Selna and referred to Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick., filed by plaintiff Henry Frederick Ramey, Jr. (Attachments: #1 CV-71, #2 Summons 1, #3 Summons 2, #4 Summons 3, #5 Summons 4) (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
