Scott Springman v. FCA US LLC et al
Plaintiff: Scott Springman
Defendant: FCA US LLC and Does 1-20, inclusive
Case Number: 5:2021cv00714
Filed: April 21, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha
Referring Judge: Sheri Pym
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 17, 2021 Filing 11 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Consent to Proceed (CV-11C) before US Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program Non-Final #10 . The following error(s) was/were found: Other error(s) with document(s): Wrong event and form used, the correct event is "Notice">"Notice of Lodging" and the correct form CV 11D form has to be attached. Please refer to General Order 18-11.. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (rn)
June 16, 2021 Filing 10 STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Plaintiff Scott Springman. (Kavicky, Erika)
June 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (vv)
April 22, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachments 8 Civil Cover Sheet is attached to the Notice of Removal. Each of these documents should have been filed and entered separately under its correct event/relief. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ghap)
April 22, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
April 22, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case and Notice re Consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 21-01, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:21-cv-00714 FLA (SPx). (ghap)
April 21, 2021 NON CONFORM COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant FCA US LLC. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT D)(ghap)
April 21, 2021 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-20, Inclusive, FCA US LLC. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Scott Springman. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 2/26/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap)
April 21, 2021 Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant FCA US LLC, re Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #2 , Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123), #4 , Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123), #3 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 served on April 21, 2021. (Skanes, Mark)
April 21, 2021 Filing 4 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Mark W Skanes counsel for Defendant FCA US LLC. Adding Michael J. Gregg as counsel of record for FCA US LLC for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant FCA US LLC. (Skanes, Mark)
April 21, 2021 Filing 3 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Mark W Skanes counsel for Defendant FCA US LLC. Adding Mark W. Skanes as counsel of record for FCA US LLC for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant FCA US LLC. (Skanes, Mark)
April 21, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant FCA US LLC, identifying FCA North America Holdings LLC; FCA Holdco B.V.; Stellantis N.V. (formerly known as Fiat Chrysler Automobiles N.V.). (Skanes, Mark)
April 21, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Riverside County Superior Court, case number CVRI2101153 Receipt No: ACACDC-31158921 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant FCA US LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Mark Skanes in Support of FCA US LLC's Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Mark W Skanes added to party FCA US LLC(pty:dft))(Skanes, Mark)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scott Springman v. FCA US LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Scott Springman
Represented By: Scott R Kaufman
Represented By: Erika Nicolalde Kavicky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FCA US LLC
Represented By: Mark W Skanes
Represented By: Michael J Gregg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-20, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?