Anthony Gerard Fergerson v. Andrew Saul
Plaintiff: Anthony Gerard Fergerson
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Case Number: 5:2021cv00963
Filed: June 7, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Charles F Eick
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 27, 2021 Filing 14 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick for all further proceedings. Please use the case number 5:21-cv-00963 E on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. RE: Consent to Proceed before U S Magistrate Judge (AUSA filers only) - Non-Final #13 , Consent to Proceed before U S Magistrate Judge (non-AUSA) - Non-Final #11 . THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (rn)
July 26, 2021 Filing 13 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Andrew Saul. (Attorney Marla K. Letellier added to party Andrew Saul(pty:dft))(Letellier, Marla)
July 13, 2021 Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Anthony Gerard Fergerson, upon Defendant Andrew Saul served on 7/8/2021, answer due 10/6/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to reception area, or mail room. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to at Post Office available for pick up. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Office of Regional Counsel, reception area,. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Shapiro, Brian)
June 30, 2021 Filing 11 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Plaintiff Anthony Gerard Fergerson. (Shapiro, Brian)
June 30, 2021 Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Anthony Gerard Fergerson, upon Defendant Andrew Saul served on 6/24/2021, answer due 9/22/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Front Desk/Receptions. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Attorney General. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk/ front desk. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Shapiro, Brian)
June 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. Plaintiff shall promptly serve the Summons and Complaint on defendant (on the United States Attorney, or his or her authorized agent, by certified or registered mail, or in the alternative, personally at Room 7516, Federal Building, 300 North Los Angeles Street, Los Angeles, California 90012, and by certified or registered mail on the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and the Attorney General, as required by law), and shall file a proof of such service within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. [See document for details.] (es)
June 10, 2021 Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Andrew Saul. (es)
June 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick: Granting #3 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (es)
June 8, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and referred to Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (ghap)
June 7, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Anthony Gerard Fergerson, (Shapiro, Brian)
June 7, 2021 Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Anthony Gerard Fergerson. (Shapiro, Brian)
June 7, 2021 Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Anthony Gerard Fergerson. (Shapiro, Brian)
June 7, 2021 Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Anthony Gerard Fergerson. (Shapiro, Brian)
June 7, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Anthony Gerard Fergerson. (Attorney Brian C Shapiro added to party Anthony Gerard Fergerson(pty:pla))(Shapiro, Brian)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Anthony Gerard Fergerson v. Andrew Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Represented By: Marla K. Letellier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anthony Gerard Fergerson
Represented By: Brian C Shapiro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?