Rod Anthony Huff v. California
Rod Anthony Huff, Jr. |
California |
5:2021cv00967 |
June 7, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Andre Birotte |
Rozella A Oliver |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 NOTICE OF DOCUMENT DISCREPANCIES AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver ORDERING First Amended Complaint submitted by Plaintiff Rod Anthony Huff, Jr received on 7/19/2021 to be filed and processed. Case closed on 6/16/2021 (See Dkt. 4). Document filed but not considered by the Court. (dml) |
Filing 9 MISC DOCUMENT [First Amended Complaint] filed by Plaintiff Rod Anthony Huff, Jr. (dml) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF DOCUMENT DISCREPANCIES AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver ORDERING Notice of Lien(s) submitted by Plaintiff Rod Anthony Huff, Jr received on 7/12/2021 to be filed. Case closed on 6/16/2021. Relief sought by plaintiff is unclear. Document filed but not considered by the Court. (dml) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF DOCUMENT DISCREPANCIES AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver ORDERING Motion to Vacate Void Judgment submitted by Plaintiff Rod Anthony Huff, Jr received on 7/6/2021 to be filed and processed. Case closed on 6/16/2021. Relief sought is unclear. Document filed but not considered by the Court. (dml) |
Filing 7 MISC DOCUMENT [Notice of Lien(s)] filed by Plaintiff Rod Anthony Huff, Jr. (dml) |
Filing 5 Motion to Vacate Void Judgment filed by plaintiff Rod Anthony Huff (dml) |
Filing 4 ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Denying #2 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees, and this case is hereby DISMISSED immediately. IT WAS RECOMMENDED that the Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees be DENIED by Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. Reasons: Frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Seeks monetary relief from a defendant immune from such relief. Leave to amend would be futile. ( MD JS-6, Case Terminated. ) (gk) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and referred to Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (et) |
Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Rod Anthony Huff, Jr. (et) |
Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendant California pursuant to 42:1983. Case assigned to Judge Andre Birotte Jr and referred to Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver., filed by Plaintiff Rod Anthony Huff, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (et) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Rod Anthony Huff v. California | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Rod Anthony Huff, Jr. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: California | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.