Mark Mohr et al v. Catlin Insurance Company
| Angela Mohr and Mark Mohr |
| Catlin Insurance Company and Does 1 to 20, inclusive |
| 5:2021cv01014 |
| June 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Kenly Kiya Kato |
| Mark C Scarsi |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than July 11, 2022. (smo)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER RE: JURY TRIAL by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. Final Pretrial Conference set for 9/19/2022 at 2:00 PM and Jury Trial set for 10/4/2022 at 8:30 AM before Judge Mark C. Scarsi. See document for additional pretrial dates and deadlines. (smo)
|
|
Filing 9
TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TAKING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE UNDER SUBMISSION by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: The Court has considered the parties' Joint Rule 16(b)/26(f) Report with respect to the Scheduling Conference and has concluded that the hearing on August 9, 2021 is not necessary. Accordingly, the Scheduling Conference is taken off calendar and under submission. No appearance by counsel is necessary. A separate order will issue setting the deadlines and dates for this case. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (smo)
|
| Filing 8 JOINT RULE 26(f) REPORT filed by Plaintiffs Angela Mohr, Mark Mohr. (Townsend, Eric) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. Scheduling Conference set for 8/9/2021 at 10:00 AM before Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo)
|
|
Filing 6
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MARK C. SCARSI upon filing of the complaint by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case and Notice re Consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 21-01, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:21-cv-01014 MCS (KKx). (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Catlin Insurance Company, Does 1 through 100, inclusive. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiffs Mark Mohr, Angela Mohr. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 4/30/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1) (ghap) |
| NON CONFORM COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Catlin Insurance Company. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 3)(ghap) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Catlin Insurance Company, (Burton, Michelle) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Catlin Insurance Company. (Burton, Michelle) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Riverside Superior Court, case number CVSW2103765 Receipt No: ACACDC-31481338 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Catlin Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 Summons, #3 Exhibit 3 Answer) (Attorney Michelle L Burton added to party Catlin Insurance Company(pty:dft))(Burton, Michelle) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
