Cynthia Daniels v. Andrew Saul
Plaintiff: Cynthia Daniels
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Case Number: 5:2021cv01034
Filed: June 21, 2021
Court: U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Ronald SW Lew
Referring Judge: Douglas F McCormick
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 30, 2021 Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Cynthia Daniels, upon Defendant Andrew Saul served on 7/16/2021, answer due 10/14/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to F. De la Rosa. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Ealy Sase. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Clerk. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Yancey, Martha)
July 23, 2021 Filing 10 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Andrew Saul. (Attorney Michael K Marriott added to party Andrew Saul(pty:dft))(Marriott, Michael)
July 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS Order Re Procedures in Social Security Appeal by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (nbo)
July 8, 2021 Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Andrew Saul. (nbo)
July 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick: granting #4 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis re APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #4 . (nbo)
June 23, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Ronald S.W. Lew and referred to Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (ghap)
June 21, 2021 Filing 5 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Cynthia Daniels, (Yancey, Martha)
June 21, 2021 Filing 4 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Plaintiff Cynthia Daniels. (Yancey, Martha)
June 21, 2021 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Cynthia Daniels. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons)(Yancey, Martha)
June 21, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Cynthia Daniels. (Yancey, Martha)
June 21, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Cynthia Daniels. (Attorney Martha Woods Yancey added to party Cynthia Daniels(pty:pla))(Yancey, Martha)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cynthia Daniels v. Andrew Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Represented By: Michael K Marriott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cynthia Daniels
Represented By: Martha Woods Yancey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?