Monica Arredondo v. Andrew Saul
| Monica Arredondo |
| Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew Saul |
| 5:2021cv01036 |
| June 21, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alka Sagar |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Re: Notice from Clerk re: Final Consent to Proceed before US Magistrate Judge, 13 the Case has been reassigned from Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato to Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar for all further proceedings. The case will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 5:21-cv-01036-AS. (sn) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato for all further proceedings. Please use the case number EDCV21-1036 AS on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (sn) |
| Filing 12 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Andrew Saul. (Attorney Michael K Marriott added to party Andrew Saul(pty:dft))(Marriott, Michael) |
| Filing 11 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Plaintiff Monica Arredondo. (Benavides, Francesco) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Monica Arredondo, upon Defendant Andrew Saul served on 7/6/2021, answer due 10/4/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to C. Veloz. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Not Legible. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Peter Thompson. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certified Mail Return Receipts)(Benavides, Francesco) |
Filing 9
ORDER RE: PROCEDURES IN SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (see document for details) (Attachments: #1 Blank Consent Form) (hr)
|
| Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Andrew Saul. (hr) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar: granting #5 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (hr)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and referred to Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (et) |
| Filing 5 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Monica Arredondo. (Benavides, Francesco) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Monica Arredondo. (Benavides, Francesco) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Monica Arredondo, (Benavides, Francesco) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Monica Arredondo. (Benavides, Francesco) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Monica Arredondo. (Attorney Francesco P Benavides added to party Monica Arredondo(pty:pla))(Benavides, Francesco) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
