Van Roshell v. Andrew Saul
Plaintiff: Van Roshell
Defendant: Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew Saul
Case Number: 5:2021cv01143
Filed: July 8, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Rozella A Oliver
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 416
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 3, 2021 Filing 15 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver for all further proceedings. Please use the case number 5:21-cv-01143 RAO on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. RE: Consent to Proceed before U S Magistrate Judge (non-AUSA) - Non-Final #14 , Consent to Proceed before U S Magistrate Judge (AUSA filers only) - Non-Final #10 . THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (rn)
August 2, 2021 Filing 14 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Plaintiff Van Roshell. (Benavides, Francesco)
August 2, 2021 Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Van Roshell, upon Defendant Andrew Saul served on 7/19/2021, answer due 10/18/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to C. Veloz. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Eddie Anderson. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Ronnie Oliver, Legal Assistant. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certified Mail Return Receipts)(Benavides, Francesco)
July 26, 2021 Filing 12 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Lynn M Harada counsel for Defendant Andrew Saul. Lynn Harada is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Comissioner of Social Security. (Harada, Lynn)
July 26, 2021 Filing 11 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Stacy Wiesbrock counsel for Defendant Andrew Saul. Adding Stacy Wiesbrock as counsel of record for Comissioner of Social Security for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Comissioner of Social Security. (Attorney Stacy Wiesbrock added to party Andrew Saul(pty:dft))(Wiesbrock, Stacy)
July 23, 2021 Filing 10 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Andrew Saul. (Attorney Lynn M Harada added to party Andrew Saul(pty:dft))(Harada, Lynn)
July 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER RE: PROCEDURES IN SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL by Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. See Order for complete details. [Chambers courtesy copies are not required.] (dml)
July 12, 2021 Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Andrew Saul. (dml)
July 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver: granting #5 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60) re REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support #5 . (dml)
July 9, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and referred to Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (jtil)
July 8, 2021 Filing 5 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Van Roshell. (Attachments: #1 Supplement) (Benavides, Francesco)
July 8, 2021 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Van Roshell. (Benavides, Francesco)
July 8, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Van Roshell, (Benavides, Francesco)
July 8, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Van Roshell. (Benavides, Francesco)
July 8, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Van Roshell. (Attorney Francesco P Benavides added to party Van Roshell(pty:pla))(Benavides, Francesco)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Van Roshell v. Andrew Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Van Roshell
Represented By: Francesco P Benavides
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Represented By: Stacy Wiesbrock
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Represented By: Lynn M Harada
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?