Amazing 34, LLC v. Kingsbrook Brokerage Service, Inc.
| Amazing 34, LLC |
| Kingsbrook Brokerage Service, Inc., Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company, Risk Placement Services, Inc. and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive |
| Does |
| 5:2021cv01151 |
| July 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jesus G Bernal |
| Sheri Pym |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 31 REPLY Reply in Support of Motion to Remand to Remand Case to #18 filed by Plaintiff Amazing 34, LLC. (Hobbs, Kristin) |
| Filing 30 Notice of Withdrawal of Motion for Entry of Default,, #14 filed by defendant Kingsbrook Brokerage Service, Inc.. (Courteau, Diana) |
| Filing 29 SUPPLEMENT to to Remand Case to #18 Proposed Order filed by Defendant Kingsbrook Brokerage Service, Inc.. (Courteau, Diana) |
| Filing 28 SUPPLEMENT to Request for Judicial Notice, #25 filed by Defendant Kingsbrook Brokerage Service, Inc.. (Courteau, Diana) |
| Filing 27 SUPPLEMENT to MEMORANDUM in Opposition to Motion, #24 filed by Defendant Kingsbrook Brokerage Service, Inc.. (Courteau, Diana) |
| Filing 26 Objection to Plaintiff's Evidence Within Plaintiff's Motion to Remand and Request for Judicial Notice Opposition re: to Remand Case to #18 filed by Defendant Kingsbrook Brokerage Service, Inc.. (Courteau, Diana) |
| Filing 25 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re to Remand Case to #18 filed by Defendant Kingsbrook Brokerage Service, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit)(Courteau, Diana) |
| Filing 24 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to to Remand Case to #18 filed by Defendant Kingsbrook Brokerage Service, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit, #11 Exhibit, #12 Exhibit, #13 Exhibit, #14 Exhibit, #15 Exhibit, #16 Exhibit)(Courteau, Diana) |
| Filing 23 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company, identifying Amazing 34, LLC, Risk Placement Services, Inc., and Kingsbrook Brokerage Service, Inc.. (Desai, Asim) |
Filing 22
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. Scheduling Conference set for 11/22/2021 at 11:00 AM before Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (npo)
|
| Filing 21 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Complaint (Discovery) #20 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (twdb) |
| Filing 20 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company.(Desai, Asim) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice (Other) #18 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Motion to Remand. Other error(s) with document(s): The motion hearing date would have been set using the motion event. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (twdb) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE filed by Plaintiff Amazing 34, LLC. NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO REMAND; POINTS AND AUTHORITIES (Attachments: #1 Declaration DECLARATION OF KRISTIN HOBBS IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF AMAZING 34, LLCS MOTION TO REMAND, #2 Unredacted Document PLAINTIFF AMAZING 34, LLCS REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF MOTION AND MOTION TO REMAND, #3 Declaration DECLARATION OF NABEEL SHAIKH, #4 Proposed Order PROPOSED ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF' AMAZING 34, LLC'S MOTION TO REMAND)(Hobbs, Kristin) Modified on 8/2/2021 (twdb). |
| Filing 17 Opposition re: EX PARTE APPLICATION for Entry of Default against defendant Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company and/or to strike improper stipulation ECF 12 #14 filed by Cross Defendant Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company, Defendant Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Asim K. Desai in Support of Defendant Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company's Opposition to Ex Parte Application, #2 Exhibit 1 to Declaration of Asim K. Desai, #3 Exhibit 2 to Declaration of Asim K. Desai, #4 Exhibit 3 to Declaration of Asim K. Desai, #5 Exhibit 4 to Declaration of Asim K. Desai)(Ulich, Robert) |
| Filing 16 PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT KINGSBROOK BROKERAGE SERVICE, INC.'S EX PARTE APPLICATION; DECLARATION OF KRISTIN HOBBS Opposition Defendant's Ex Parte Motion re: EX PARTE APPLICATION for Entry of Default against defendant Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company and/or to strike improper stipulation ECF 12 #14 filed by Plaintiff Amazing 34, LLC. (Hobbs, Kristin) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: EX PARTE APPLICATION #14 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed order not submitted pursuant to Local Rule 52-4.1. A Word or Wordperfect version of the proposed order should also be emailed to the chambers generic email address. Pursuant to Local Rule 5-4.4.1- Proposed orders not lodged with a main document shall be electronically lodged as an attachment to a Notice of Lodging. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. (iv) |
| Filing 14 (WITHDRAWN PURSUANT TO #30) [DEFENDANT KINGSBROOK'S EX PARTE APPLICATION, MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 7-19 SEEKING TO STRIKE IMPROPER STIPULATION AND/OR SEEKING AN OSC RE DEFAULT FOR DEFENDANT MESA UNDERSWRITERS SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY filed as] EX PARTE APPLICATION for Entry of Default against defendant Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company and/or to strike improper stipulation ECF 12 filed by defendant Kingsbrook Brokerage Service, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration) (Courteau, Diana) Modified on 7/27/2021 (iv). Modified on 8/26/2021 (twdb). |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Robert Ulich on behalf of Cross Defendant Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company, Defendant Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company (Attorney Robert Ulich added to party Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company(pty:crd), Attorney Robert Ulich added to party Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company(pty:dft))(Ulich, Robert) |
| Filing 12 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company answer now due 8/16/2021, re Complaint - (Discovery) filed by defendant Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company.(Attorney Asim K Desai added to party Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company(pty:crd))(Desai, Asim) |
|
Filing 11
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (ima)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Crossclaim #9 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 19-1 Complaint/Petition includes more than 10 Does or fictitiously named parties. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (twdb) |
| Filing 9 CROSSCLAIM against Defendant and Cross-Defendant Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company, filed by defendant and cross-claimant Kingsbrook Brokerage Service, Inc..(Courteau, Diana) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by defendant Kingsbrook Brokerage Service, Inc..(Courteau, Diana) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Kingsbrook Brokerage Service, Inc., (Courteau, Diana) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (jtil) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Amazing 34, LLC in San Bernardino Superior Court on 5/11/2021, attached as Exhibit 1. (jtil) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Kingsbrook Brokerage Service, Inc.. (Courteau, Diana) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of Calif. County of San Bernardino, case number CIV SB 2113942 Receipt No: ACACDC-31607218 - Fee: $402, filed by defendant Kingsbrook Brokerage Service, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Summons, #3 Proof of Service) (Attorney Diana L Courteau added to party Kingsbrook Brokerage Service, Inc.(pty:dft))(Courteau, Diana) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
