Karl N. Steen v. B. Kibler
Karl N. Steen |
B. Kibler |
5:2021cv01182 |
July 15, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Maria A Audero |
John W Holcomb |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER GRANTING ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE ANSWER TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero: (1) The time for filing an Answer to the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is extended to and includes October 20, 2021. (2) Petitioner may file a Reply to the Answer within thirty days of the date the Answer is filed. #6 (es) |
Filing 6 APPLICATION for Enlargement of Time to File Answer to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Respondent B. Kibler. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Chenelia, Kristen) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Kristen Kinnaird Chenelia on behalf of Respondent B. Kibler (Attorney Kristen Kinnaird Chenelia added to party B. Kibler(pty:res))(Chenelia, Kristen) |
Filing 4 ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE TO PETITION (28 U.S.C. 2254) by Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. Respondent may file and serve an Answer to the Petition within forty-five (45) days after the date of this Order. Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. Motions to Dismiss shall be filed by 9/5/2021. (Attachments: #1 Attach.1, #2 Attach.2_Part 1 of 3, #3 Attach.2_Part 2 of 3, #4 Attach.2_Part 3 of 3) (es) |
Filing 3 ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. IT IS ORDERED that the Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is hereby GRANTED. #1 (es) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge John W. Holcomb and referred to Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (jtil) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254), filed by Petitioner Karl N. Steen. Case assigned to Judge John W. Holcomb and referred to Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (Attachments: #1 Part 2, #2 Part 3) (jtil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Karl N. Steen v. B. Kibler | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Karl N. Steen | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: B. Kibler | |
Represented By: | Kristen Kinnaird Chenelia |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.