Lance Hall v. Circle K Stores, Inc. et al
| Lance Hall |
| Circle K Stores, Inc. and Does 1 through 100, inclusive |
| 5:2021cv01203 |
| July 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Shashi H Kewalramani |
| Otis D Wright |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: In light of Plaintiff's Response to the Courts Order to Show Cause, in which Plaintiff reactively (not proactively) informed the Court of the settlement of this matter, the Court ordered the parties to file a dismissal that complies with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 and set a deadline of October 13, 2021. (ECF No. 17); see C.D. Cal. L.R. 16-15.7 (requiring counsel to proactively and immediately report settlements to the court). The Court noted that "[f]ailure to timely comply with this order shall result in the dismissal of this action." Having received no response from Plaintiff to the Court's Order, the Court hereby DISMISSES the entire action, including all individual and class claims asserted therein. The Clerk of the Court shall close the case. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lc)
|
|
Filing 17
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Plaintiff's timely Response to the Court's Order to Show Cause re: Dismissal For Lack of Prosecution indicates that Plaintiff and Defendant have tentatively settled this case on an individual basis. By October 13, 2021, the parties shall file a dismissal that reflects this settlement and that complies with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41, or, if not, the parties shall file a Status Report describing their progress. If Plaintiff dismisses his individual claims but does not also dismiss his class or representative claims, then Plaintiff is ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE, also by October 13, 2021, why this case should not be dismissed for lack of a named plaintiff. (lc)
|
| Filing 16 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Lance Hall to Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution (Cole, Scott) |
|
Filing 15
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Plaintiff(s) is ordered to show cause in writing no later than September 10, 2021 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Court will consider the filing of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above date: Plaintiff's request for entry of default as to the defendant. In the event both documents are filed before the above date, the answer will take precedence. Answer by the defendant(s). Failure to respond to the Court's Order may result in the dismissal of the action. (lc) Modified on 9/9/2021 (lc).
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER RE: STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT BY 14 DAYS #13 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II : Defendant Circle K Stores, Inc.'s deadline to file a responsive pleading be continued to September 8, 2021. (lc)
|
| Filing 13 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to 9/8/2021 re Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Circle K Stores, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Braham, Christopher) |
| Filing 12 Notice of Change of Law Firm Name filed by Plaintiff Lance Hall (Van Note, Laura) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Lance Hall, re Notice to Counsel re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge served on 7/27/21. (Van Note, Laura) |
| Filing 10 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Circle K Stores, Inc. answer now due 8/25/2021, re Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Circle K Stores, Inc..(Braham, Christopher) |
|
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. The Court's Electronic Document Submission System (EDSS) allows people without lawyers who havepending cases in the United States District Court for the Central District of California to submit documents electronically to the Clerk's Office The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. Please refer to Court's Website and Judge's procedures for information as applicable. (lc)
|
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case and Notice re Consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case was initially assigned to District Judge John W. Holcomb and referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 21-01, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:21-cv-01203 ODW (SHKx). (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Compliance with 28 USC Sec. 1446(D) filed by Defendant Circle K Stores, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Notice to the Clerk, #2 Exhibit B - Notice to Adverse Parties)(Braham, Christopher) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Circle K Stores, Inc. identifying Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. as Corporate Parent. (Braham, Christopher) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Circle K Stores, Inc., identifying Plaintiff Lance Hall. (Braham, Christopher) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Circle K Stores, Inc.. (Braham, Christopher) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Riverside, case number CVRI2102516 Receipt No: ACACDC-31654658 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Circle K Stores, Inc.. (Attorney Christopher A Braham added to party Circle K Stores, Inc.(pty:dft))(Braham, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
