Nelly Murillo Hogge v. Costco Wholesale Corporation, et al
Plaintiff: Nelly Murillo Hogge
Defendant: Costco Wholesale Corporation and Does 1 to 50 inclusive
Case Number: 5:2021cv01268
Filed: July 29, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Kenly Kiya Kato
Referring Judge: Mark C Scarsi
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than May 9, 2022. (smo)
September 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER RE: JURY TRIAL by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. Final Pretrial Conference set for 7/18/2022 at 2:00 PM and Jury Trial set for 8/2/2022 at 8:30 AM before Judge Mark C. Scarsi. See document for additional pretrial dates and deadlines. (smo)
September 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TAKING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE UNDER SUBMISSION by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: The Court has considered the parties' Joint Rule 16(b)/26(f) Report with respect to the Scheduling Conference and has concluded that the hearing on September 20, 2021 is not necessary. Accordingly, the Scheduling Conference is taken off calendar and under submission. No appearance by counsel is necessary. A separate order will issue setting the deadlines and dates for this case. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (smo)
September 7, 2021 Filing 9 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: State Report #7 by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. The document is accepted as filed. (smo)
September 7, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Report #7 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Joint Report Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan. Other error(s) with document(s): Note: To assist in a search for correct events, please use the "SEARCH" option for a "key word" to narrow the selection process. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc)
September 7, 2021 Filing 7 STATUS REPORT of Joint Rule 26(F) filed by Plaintiff Nelly Murillo Hogge. (Osborne, Ryne)
July 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. Scheduling Conference is set for 9/20/2021 at 10:00 AM before Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (jgr)
July 29, 2021 Filing 5 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MARK C. SCARSI upon the filing of the complaint. (jgr)
July 29, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa)
July 29, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case and Notice re Consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 21-01, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:21-cv=01268 MCS (KKx). (esa)
July 29, 2021 Filing 2 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation.. (Holtz, James)
July 29, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Riverside, case number CVSW2104991 Receipt No: ACACDC-31712963 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Notice of Interested Parties) (Attorney James F Holtz added to party Costco Wholesale Corporation(pty:dft))(Holtz, James)
July 29, 2021 CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint, Jury Demand, filed by defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation. (filed in state court 7/23/2021, submitted as document 1, attachment 3)(esa)
July 29, 2021 CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Costco Wholesale Corporation, Does, filed.by plaintiff Nelly Murillo Hogge. (filed in state court 6/10/2021, submitted as document 1, attachment 1) (esa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nelly Murillo Hogge v. Costco Wholesale Corporation, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nelly Murillo Hogge
Represented By: Dario C Gomez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Costco Wholesale Corporation
Represented By: Natalie Holtz
Represented By: James F Holtz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 to 50 inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?