Paul Rosso-Sanchez v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. et al
| Paul Rosso-Sanchez |
| Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. and Does 1-50, inclusive |
| 5:2021cv01409 |
| August 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Kenly Kiya Kato |
| John A Kronstadt |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER ISSUED ON AUGUST 20, 2021 (DKT. #10 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Scheduling Conference will be taken under submission after the Joint Rule 16(b)/26(f) Report is filed. No appearance by counsel will be necessary. A separate order will issue setting the deadlines and dates for this case. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (tj) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 11 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Stephen Dane Counts counsel for Plaintiff Paul Rosso-Sanchez. Adding Stephen D. Counts as counsel of record for Paul Ross-Sanchez for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Attorney Stephen D. Counts. (Attorney Stephen Dane Counts added to party Paul Rosso-Sanchez(pty:pla))(Counts, Stephen) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b)/26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Counsel shall file a Joint Report consistent with this Order. A hearing is not necessary and, therefore, the matter is taken under submission. Upon review of the Joint Report, a scheduling order will be issued. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 11/19/2021. Scheduling Conference set for 11/29/2021 at 01:30 PM before Judge John A. Kronstadt. (droj)
|
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (droj)
|
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case and Notice re Consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 21-01, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge John A. Kronstadt. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:21-cv-01409 JAK (KKx). (lh) |
| NON-CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint, filed by Defendant Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 )(lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS Executed by Plaintiff Paul Rosso-Sanchez, upon Defendant Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. served on 7/21/2021, answer due 8/11/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Kaitlyn Mannix, Agent for Service in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service. Original Summons NOT returned. (FILED IN SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 7/30/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Paul Rosso-Sanchez. (FILED IN SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 9/20/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc., re Jury Demand #4 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties,, #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 served on 08/19/2021. (Kosch, Lois) |
| Filing 4 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Defendant Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc... (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Kosch, Lois) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc., identifying Sedgwick, L.P., Sedgwick Holdings, Inc., Lightning Cayman Merger Sub, Ltd, Stone Point Capital, Caisse de depot et placement du Quebec (CDPQ), The Carlyle Group, Onex Corporation, York Risk Services Group, Inc., Fox Hill Holdings, Inc., York Insurance Holdings, Inc., York Risk Services Holding Corp., Onex York Mid. Corp., Onex York Holdings Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Kosch, Lois) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Kosch, Lois) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Bernardino, case number CIVSB2117315 Receipt No: ACACDC-31839375 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Lois M. Kosch, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Declaration of Jana Borgesi, #9 Exhibit A, #10 Proof of Service) (Attorney Lois M Kosch added to party Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.(pty:dft))(Kosch, Lois) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
