Deborah R. Peterson v. Apex Business Solutions, LLC
Deborah R. Peterson and Deborah Marshall |
Apex Business Solutions, LLC |
5:2021cv01477 |
August 31, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Stanley Blumenfeld |
Sheri Pym |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by plaintiff Deborah R. Peterson. Dismissal is without prejudice and with leave to reinstate through December 10, 2021. After December 10, 2021, the dismissal shall become with prejudice. (Figueroa, Alejandro) |
Filing 7 CIVIL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (vcr) |
Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (ghap) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Deborah R Peterson, (Figueroa, Alejandro) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Deborah R Peterson. (Figueroa, Alejandro) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31902031 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Deborah R Peterson. (Attorney Alejandro Emmanuel Figueroa added to party Deborah R Peterson(pty:pla))(Figueroa, Alejandro) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.