Ryan Carson v. FedEx Supply Chain, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Ryan Carson
Defendant: FedEx Supply Chain, Inc. and Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Case Number: 5:2021cv01489
Filed: September 1, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Dale S Fischer
Referring Judge: Kenly Kiya Kato
2 Judge: Shashi H Kewalramani
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 2 by Judge Dale S. Fischer. Case ordered to Court Mediation Panel for mediation. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 11/28/22. (rfi)
October 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 Order re Jury Trial by Judge Dale S. Fischer. These dates and requirements are firm. The Court is very unlikely to grant continuances unless the parties establish good cause through a concrete showing. Failure to complete discovery in a timely manner does not constitute good cause, nor does the fact that a settlement conference is pending. Each side is limited to five motions in limine, unless the Court orders otherwise. See Trial Order for specifics. Final Pretrial Conference set for 1/23/2023 at 3:00 PM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. Jury Trial set for 2/21/2023 at 8:30 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (rfi)
October 20, 2021 Filing 13 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: (IN CHAMBERS) SCHEDULING ORDER. The Court takes the Scheduling Conference off calendar and establishes the case management dates as proposed by parties in the Joint Rule 26(f) Report as further described in the Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates except as noted in the Order re Trial. (See Order re Trial for specific dates and times.) These dates and requirements are firm. The Court is very unlikely to grant continuances unless the parties establish good cause through a concrete showing. Failure to complete discovery in a timely manner does not constitute good cause, nor does the fact that a settlement conference is pending. Each side is limited to five motions in limine unless the Court orders otherwise. All fictitiously named defendants are dismissed. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rfi) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
October 18, 2021 Filing 12 JOINT RULE 26(f) SCHEDULING REPORT filed by Defendant FedEx Supply Chain, Inc.. (Golper, Matthew)
September 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Joint Report must include the completed Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates. Lead trial counsel are ordered to appear in person unless counsel have been excused by the Court. Scheduling Conference set for 10/25/2021 at 11:00 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (rfi)
September 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi)
September 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER TO REASSIGN CASE due to self-recusal pursuant to General Order 21-01 by Judge Christina A. Snyder. Case transferred from Judge Christina A. Snyder to the calendar of Judge Dale S. Fischer for all further proceedings. Case number now reads as 5:21-cv-01489 DSF(SHKx). (rn)
September 20, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato to Judge Christina A. Snyder for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 5:21-cv-01489 CAS(SHKx). (rn)
September 7, 2021 Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant FedEx Supply Chain, Inc., re Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 , Corporate Disclosure Statement, #4 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 served on September 1, 2021. (Golper, Matthew)
September 1, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (Attachments: #1 CV11C Statement of Consent) (et)
September 1, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to clerical error. Case is transferred to the Eastern Division. Case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato for all further proceedings. New Case Number 5:21-cv-01489-KK. (et)
September 1, 2021 Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Fedex Supply Chain, Inc., a Delaware Corporation identifying FedEx Supply Chain Holdings, Inc., Fedex Supply Chain Distribution System, Inc., FedEx Logistics, Inc., FedEx Corporation as Corporate Parent. (Golper, Matthew)
September 1, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Fedex Supply Chain, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, identifying FedEx Supply Chain, Inc.. (Golper, Matthew)
September 1, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Fedex Supply Chain, Inc., a Delaware Corporation. (Golper, Matthew)
September 1, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Riverside Superior Court, case number CVRI2102575 Receipt No: ACACDC-31909721 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Fedex Supply Chain, Inc., a Delaware Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of L. Beckton, #2 Declaration Declaration of M. Golper, #3 Exhibit Exhibit A - Complaint, #4 Exhibit Exhibit B - State Court Docs, #5 Exhibit Exhibit C - Answer to Complaint) (Attorney Matthew Brent Golper added to party Fedex Supply Chain, Inc., a Delaware Corporation(pty:dft))(Golper, Matthew)
September 1, 2021 NON-CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER TO COMPLAINT filed by Defendant FedEx Supply Chain, Inc. [SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT C TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ]. (et)
September 1, 2021 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants FedEx Supply Chain, Inc., Does 1 through 100, inclusive. Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Ryan Carson. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 6/16/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT A TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ]. (et)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ryan Carson v. FedEx Supply Chain, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ryan Carson
Represented By: Shelley K Mack
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FedEx Supply Chain, Inc.
Represented By: Matthew Brent Golper
Represented By: Alexis Nicole Cirkinyan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?