Darren Millam et al v. Energizer Holdings, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: MILLAM DARREN, DONALD DSPRINKEL, Darren Millam and Donald Sprinkel
Defendant: ENERGIZER BRANDS, LLC,
Interested Party: Energizer Brands, LLC and Energizer Holdings, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2021cv01500
Filed: September 2, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John W Holcomb
Referring Judge: Shashi H Kewalramani
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT #18 by Judge John W. Holcomb. I further ORDER that Defendants' responsive pleadings are now due December 1, 2021. (lom)
October 20, 2021 Filing 19 NOTICE of Errata of Stipulation to Extend Time filed by Defendants Energizer Brands, LLC, Energizer Holdings, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Corrected Stipulation, #2 Exhibit B - Proposed Order)(Papini Chapla, H)
October 20, 2021 Filing 18 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to 12/1/2021 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendants Energizer Brands, LLC, Energizer Holdings, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Papini Chapla, H)
September 30, 2021 Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney H Camille Papini Chapla on behalf of Defendants Energizer Brands, LLC, Energizer Holdings, Inc. (Attorney H Camille Papini Chapla added to party Energizer Brands, LLC(pty:dft), Attorney H Camille Papini Chapla added to party Energizer Holdings, Inc.(pty:dft))(Papini Chapla, H)
September 28, 2021 Filing 16 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Energizer Brands, LLC answer now due 11/1/2021; Energizer Holdings, Inc. answer now due 11/1/2021, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendants Energizer Brands, LLC; Energizer Holdings, Inc..(Herrington, Robert)
September 28, 2021 Filing 15 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Energizer Brands, LLC, Energizer Holdings, Inc., identifying N/A. (Herrington, Robert)
September 28, 2021 Filing 14 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Robert J Herrington counsel for Defendants Energizer Brands, LLC, Energizer Holdings, Inc.. Adding Robert J. Herrington as counsel of record for ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC. and ENERGIZER BRANDS, LLC for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendants ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC. and ENERGIZER BRANDS, LLC. (Attorney Robert J Herrington added to party Energizer Brands, LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Robert J Herrington added to party Energizer Holdings, Inc.(pty:dft))(Herrington, Robert)
September 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 STANDING ORDER by Judge John W. Holcomb. (iva)
September 3, 2021 Filing 12 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Darren Millam. (Green, Alexandra)
September 3, 2021 Filing 11 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Miscellaneous Document #5 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): An incorrect event was selected for Document No. 5. The correct event is Summons Request. You are not required to take any action in response to this notice unless the Court so directs. (lh)
September 3, 2021 Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendants Energizer Brands, LLC, Energizer Holdings, Inc. (lh)
September 3, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: The Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71)is missing or incomplete. All civil actions presented for filing must be accompanied by a completed Civil Cover Sheet. See Local Rule 3-1. Counsel must file a completed Civil Cover Sheet immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (lh)
September 3, 2021 Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh)
September 3, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
September 3, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John W. Holcomb and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (lh)
September 2, 2021 Filing 5 Proposed Summons filed by Plaintiffs MILLAM DARREN, DONALD DSPRINKEL (Green, Alexandra)
September 2, 2021 Filing 4 DECLARATION of ALEXANDRA K. GREEN CLRA Venue Dec OF Plaintiff's Counsel filed by Plaintiffs MILLAM DARREN, DONALD DSPRINKEL. (Green, Alexandra)
September 2, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE filed by Plaintiff MILLAM DARREN. of Pendency of Other Actions or Proceedings (Green, Alexandra)
September 2, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff All Plaintiffs, (Green, Alexandra)
September 2, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31924478 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff DONALD DSPRINKEL, MILLAM DARREN. (Attorney Alexandra Katherine Green added to party MILLAM DARREN (pty:pla), Attorney Alexandra Katherine Green added to party DONALD DSPRINKEL(pty:pla))(Green, Alexandra)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Darren Millam et al v. Energizer Holdings, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MILLAM DARREN
Represented By: Alexandra Katherine Green
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DONALD DSPRINKEL
Represented By: Alexandra Katherine Green
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Darren Millam
Represented By: Alexandra Katherine Green
Represented By: Noah M Schubert
Represented By: Robert C Schubert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Donald Sprinkel
Represented By: Alexandra Katherine Green
Represented By: Noah M Schubert
Represented By: Robert C Schubert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ENERGIZER BRANDS, LLC,
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Energizer Brands, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Energizer Holdings, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?