Daquan Eli Tribble v. County of San Bernardino et al
| Daquan Eli Tribble |
| County of San Bernardino, San Bernardino Sheriff Department and Arrowhead Regional Medical Center |
| 5:2021cv01592 |
| September 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Maria A Audero |
| Fernando M Olguin |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 On November 3, 2021, Plaintiff Daquan Eli Tribble filed a third Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support ("Request," ECF No. #13 ). As the Court already has granted Plaintiff's previous request to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF Nos. 6, 7), the Request is DENIED as moot. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (nne) TEXT ONLY ENTRY Modified on 11/8/2021 (nne). |
Filing 14
MINUTE ORDER (In Chambers): Order Dismissing Complaint With Leave to Amend(ECF No. #1 ) by Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero: In light of the foregoing, the Court DISMISSES the Complaint with leave to amend. Plaintiff is ordered to file a response to this Order, electing to proceed with one of the following options, by no later than December 6, 2021. re: Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights), #1 [See document for further details.] (Attachments: #1 MO-Attach.1, #2 MO-Attach.2) (es)
|
| Filing 13 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Daquan Eli Tribble. (es) |
| Filing 12 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Plaintiff Daquan Eli Tribble. (es) |
| Filing 11 Text Only Entry - IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero: On October 25, 2021, Plaintiff Daquan Eli Tribble filed a Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support ("Request," ECF No. #10 ). As the Court already has granted Plaintiff's previous request to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF Nos. 6, 7), the Request is DENIED as moot. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jm) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 10 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Daquan Eli Tribble. (es) |
|
Filing 9
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order Denying Plaintiff's Request (ECF No. #5 ) by Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero: On October 6, 2021, the Court received Plaintiff Daquan Eli Tribble's ("Plaintiff") request for an order to go to the law library and to receive LRA forms from West Valley Detention Center as a pro se inmate ("Request"). (Req., ECF No. #5 .) Here, Plaintiff seeks an order against persons not parties to Plaintiff's lawsuit, regarding harm unrelated to Plaintiff's lawsuit. (See Req.) As such, the Court does not have jurisdiction to grant Plaintiff's request. The proper avenue for Plaintiff's request is the administrative process at West Valley Detention Center. Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff's Request is DENIED. [See document for details.] (es)
|
|
Filing 8
INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER IN CIVIL RIGHTS CASE by Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. Plaintiff is advised that the Court presently is screening the Complaint in this action, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) and 28 U.S.C. 1915A. Until the Complaint has been screened and the Court has ordered that service of process may occur, Plaintiff may not proceed with service of process upon Defendant(s). Should the Court determine that the Complaint may be served upon any or all Defendant(s), the Court will issue a separate order regarding service of process. [See document for details.] (Attachments: #1 Attach.CV-11) (es)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero: Granting #6 REQUEST for Leave to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fee. Re REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support #6 . It is further ORDERED that the prisoner-plaintiff owes the Court the initial filing fee of $350.00. An initial partial filing fee of $.75 must be paid within 30 days of the date of this order. Thereafter, monthly payments shall be forwarded to the Court in accordance with this order. (es)
|
| Filing 6 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Daquan Eli Tribble. (es) |
| Filing 5 REQUEST for Order filed by plaintiff Daquan Eli Tribble. (es) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES #2 by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. IT IS ORDERED that the Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees is: DENIED, with leave to amend within 30 days. Plaintiff may re-submit the IFP application and Complaint to this Court, if submitted with the Certified Trust Account Statement and Disbursement Authorization. Plaintiff shall utilize the same case number. If plaintiff fails to submit the required documents within 30 days, this case shall be DISMISSED. (iv)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and referred to Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (jtil) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Daquan Eli Tribble. (jtil) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Daquan Eli Tribble against Defendants Arrowhead Regional Medical Center, County of San Bernardino and San Bernardino Sheriff Department, pursuant to 42 USC 1983. Case assigned to Judge Fernando M. Olguin and referred to Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (jtil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
