Valerio Vincenzo v. My Modern Metropolis, LLC
Valerio Vincenzo |
My Modern Metropolis, LLC |
5:2021cv01623 |
September 24, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John W Holcomb |
Kenly Kiya Kato |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 501 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 ORDER by Judge John W. Holcomb: granting #15 Non-Resident Attorney Shane Rumbaugh APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of defendant My Modern Metropolis, LLC, designating John K. Buche as local counsel. (mrgo) |
Filing 17 ORDER FURTHER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT BY THIRTY (30) DAYS by Judge John W. Holcomb. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant My Modern Metropolis, LLC shall have to and including December 22, 2021 to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. (yl) |
Filing 16 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to 12/22/2021 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant My Modern Metropolis, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Buche, John) |
Filing 15 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Shane Rumbaugh to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant My Modern Metropolis, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-32331196) filed by Defendant My Modern Metropolis, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Attorney John Karl Buche added to party My Modern Metropolis, LLC(pty:dft)) (Buche, John) |
Filing 14 ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ("OSC") by Judge John W. Holcomb: In view of the Stipulation Extending Time to Answer [ECF No. #13 ] filed on November 3, 2021, the Court hereby DISCHARGES the OSC [ECF No. #12 ] issued on November 1, 2021. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (iva) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to My Modern Metropolis, LLC answer now due 11/22/2021, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Valerio Vincenzo.(Sanders, Craig) |
Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS: Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge John W. Holcomb. Generally, each Defendant must answer or otherwise respond to the complaint within 21 days after service (60 days if the Defendant is the United States). Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 12(a)(1). In the present case, it appears that Plaintiff served the summons and complaint on one or more Defendants more than 21 days ago (60 days if the Defendant is the United States), but such Defendant(s) did not file an answer or otherwise respond to the complaint. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, hereby orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before November 15. 2021, why this action should not be dismissed, with respect to each Defendant who has not filed an answer or otherwise responded to the complaint. (mrgo) |
Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Valerio Vincenzo, upon Defendant My Modern Metropolis, LLC served on 10/1/2021, answer due 10/22/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Anne Lee- Person in Charge at Residence in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Sanders, Craig) |
Filing 10 STANDING ORDER by Judge John W. Holcomb. (iva) |
Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant My Modern Metropolis, LLC. (ghap) |
Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John W. Holcomb and Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (ghap) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Valerio Vincenzo, identifying Sanders Law Group, Craig B. Sanders, My Modern Metropolis, LLC. (Sanders, Craig) |
Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Valerio Vincenzo. (Sanders, Craig) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Valerio Vincenzo. (Sanders, Craig) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Valerio Vincenzo. (Sanders, Craig) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32044040 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Valerio Vincenzo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit) (Attorney Craig B Sanders added to party Valerio Vincenzo(pty:pla))(Sanders, Craig) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Valerio Vincenzo v. My Modern Metropolis, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Valerio Vincenzo | |
Represented By: | Craig B Sanders |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: My Modern Metropolis, LLC | |
Represented By: | John Karl Buche |
Represented By: | Shane Rumbaugh |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.