Erlindo Rodriguez, Jr. v. The People
Petitioner: Erlindo Rodriguez, Jr.
Respondent: The People
Case Number: 5:2021cv01671
Filed: October 1, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Steve Kim
Referring Judge: George H Wu
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. Petitioners letter dated October 25, 2021 #8 is construed as a request for more time to respond to the Courts October 13, 2021 order to show cause. So construed, the request is granted and the deadline to respond to that order is extended to December 13, 2021. If Petitioner intends to file an amended petition, he may use the same form he used for the original petition. Enclosed are copies of the exhibits that were attached to the original petition. Petitioner is reminded that failure to respond on time to the order to show cause as directed in that order may result in the dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits) (clee)
October 26, 2021 Filing 6 FINANCIAL ENTRY: Received $5.00 from Erlindo Rodriguez, Jr.. Re: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) #1 . Receipt number LA229801. (dl)
October 25, 2021 Filing 8 REQUEST for Extension of Time filed by Petitioner Erlindo Rodriguez, Jr. (clee)
October 22, 2021 Filing 7 Letter from Petitioner. (clee)
October 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. For all these reasons, Petitioner is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE on or before Friday, November 12, 2021 why the Court should not dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction, failure to exhaust state court remedies, and untimeliness. To discharge this order, Petitioner must (1) file an amended petition naming the right respondent; (2) prove that he has exhausted his claim in state court (or that he should receive a stay of this action to permit such exhaustion); and (3) prove that he is entitled to enough tolling of the statute of limitations to make his petition timely even though it was filed more than a year after his conviction became final. On the other hand, if Petitioner no longer wishes to pursue this action, he may voluntarily dismiss the action using the attached Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Form CV-09. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). But if Petitioner files no notice of voluntary dismissal, an amended petition that cures the procedural defects outlined here, or some other timely response to this order, the petition may be involuntarily dismissed for failure to prosecute. (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). (Attachments: #1 Voluntary Dismissal Form) (clee)
October 6, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge George H. Wu and referred to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (Attachments: #1 CV111/CV69) (jtil)
October 1, 2021 Filing 3 MEMORANDUM of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion for the Appointment of a Private Investigator, filed by Petitioner Erlindo Rodriguez, Jr. (jtil)
October 1, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION for the Appointment of a Private Investigator Penal Code 987.2, filed by Petitioner Erlindo Rodriguez, Jr. (jtil)
October 1, 2021 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254), filed by Petitioner Erlindo Rodriguez, Jr. Case assigned to Judge George H. Wu and referred to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (jtil)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Erlindo Rodriguez, Jr. v. The People
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Erlindo Rodriguez, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: The People
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?