Christopher J. Steiger v. Kilolo Kijakazi
| Christopher J. Steiger |
| Acting Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi |
| 5:2021cv01738 |
| October 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Kenly Kiya Kato |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato for all further proceedings. Please use the case number EDCV21-1738 KK on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (sn) |
Filing 15
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato: The Court is in receipt of Plaintiffs (1) proof of service showing service on Defendant was completed on October 27, 2021 and (2) Response to the Court's Order to Show Cause Why Action Should Not Be Dismissed for Failure to Prosecute and Comply with Court Orders ("Order to Show Cause"). Dkts. #13 , #14 . The Order to Show Cause is, therefore, VACATED. (et)
|
| Filing 14 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Christopher J. Steigerto Order to Show Cause, #11 (Ver Planck, Mark) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Christopher J. Steiger, upon Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi served on 10/27/2021, answer due 1/25/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to NOT LEGIBLE. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to CLERK. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to CIVIL PROCESS CLERK. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Ver Planck, Mark) |
| Filing 12 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Plaintiff Christopher J. Steiger. (Ver Planck, Mark) |
|
Filing 11
MINUTE (In Chambers) Order to Show Cause Why Action Should Not Be Dismissed for Failure to Prosecute and Comply with Court Orders by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. Plaintiff shall have up to and including November 29, 2021, to respond to this Order. (see document for further details) (hr)
|
| Filing 10 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi. (Attorney Jennifer A Kenney added to party Kilolo Kijakazi(pty:dft))(Kenney, Jennifer) |
|
Filing 9
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. [See document for details.] (et)
|
| Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi. (et) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato: granting #5 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (et)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and referred to Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (esa) |
| Filing 5 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by PLAINTIFF Christopher J. Steiger. (Ver Planck, Mark) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by PLAINTIFF Christopher J. Steiger, (Ver Planck, Mark) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by PLAINTIFF Christopher J. Steiger. (Ver Planck, Mark) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Christopher J. Steiger. (Ver Planck, Mark) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by PLAINTIFF Christopher J. Steiger. (Attorney Mark Ver Planck added to party Christopher J. Steiger(pty:pla))(Ver Planck, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
