Nha Kim Guido et al v. Donohoe Chiropractic, Inc.
Plaintiff: Nha Kim and Anthony Guido, Nha Kim and Anthony Guido
Defendant: Donohoe Chiropractic, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2021cv01756
Filed: October 18, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John W Holcomb
Referring Judge: Sheri Pym
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 11, 2021 Filing 10 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Donohoe Chiropractic, Inc. answer now due 12/29/2021, filed by plaintiff Nha Kim.(Uzeta, Michelle)
October 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 STANDING ORDER by Judge John W. Holcomb. (iva)
October 20, 2021 Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Donohoe Chiropractic, Inc. (et)
October 20, 2021 Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et)
October 20, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
October 20, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John W. Holcomb and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (et)
October 18, 2021 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Nha Kim and Anthony Guido. (Uzeta, Michelle)
October 18, 2021 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Nha Kim and Anthony Guido, (Uzeta, Michelle)
October 18, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Nha Kim and Anthony Guido. (Uzeta, Michelle)
October 18, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32169154 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Nha Kim and Anthony Guido. (Attorney Michelle Uzeta added to party Nha Kim and Anthony Guido(pty:pla))(Uzeta, Michelle)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nha Kim Guido et al v. Donohoe Chiropractic, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nha Kim and Anthony Guido
Represented By: Michelle Uzeta
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nha Kim
Represented By: Michelle Uzeta
Represented By: Amanda Lockhart Seabock
Represented By: Dennis Jay Price, II
Represented By: Raymond George Ballister, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anthony Guido
Represented By: Michelle Uzeta
Represented By: Amanda Lockhart Seabock
Represented By: Dennis Jay Price, II
Represented By: Raymond George Ballister, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Donohoe Chiropractic, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?