Maceo J. Hill v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. et al
MACEO J. HILL |
FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC. and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive |
5:2021cv01877 |
November 4, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John W Holcomb |
Kenly Kiya Kato |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 DECLARATION of Margo Fullum IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC.S NOTICE OF PETITION FOR REMOVAL filed by Defendant FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC.. (Voigt, Shaun) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., (Voigt, Shaun) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC.. (Voigt, Shaun) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC. identifying FedEx Corporation as Corporate Parent. (Voigt, Shaun) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC.. (Voigt, Shaun) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Bernardino Superior Court, case number CIVSB2121590 Receipt No: ACACDC-32277711 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit Answer) (Attorney Shaun J Voigt added to party FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC. (pty:dft))(Voigt, Shaun) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.