Pedro Madrigal et al v. FCA US LLC et al
Plaintiff: Pedro Madrigal and Carmen Z Otero
Defendant: Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Petitioner: FCA US LLC
Case Number: 5:2021cv01960
Filed: November 18, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Percy Anderson
Referring Judge: Shashi H Kewalramani
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 30, 2021 Filing 12 TRANSMITTAL of documents to San Bernardino County Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to San Bernardino County Superior Court. (mrgo)
November 30, 2021 Filing 10 STATEMENT of Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge filed by Defendant FCA US LLC (Fellenz, Kyle)
November 29, 2021 Filing 11 MINUTES OF STATUS CONFERENCE via ZOOM held before Judge Percy Anderson. For the foregoing reasons, Defendants have failed to satisfy their burden of showing that diversity jurisdiction exists over this action. Accordingly, this action is remanded to San Bernardino Superior Court, Case No. CIVSB2125488, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. 1447(c). (See minute order for details). (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) Court Reporter: Miriam Baird (video). (mrgo)
November 29, 2021 Filing 9 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Daniel Max Kalinowski counsel for Plaintiffs Pedro Madrigal, Carmen Z Otero. Adding Daniel Kalinowski as counsel of record for Pedro Madrigal and Carmen Z. Otero for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiffs Pedro Madrigal and Carmen Z. Otero. (Attorney Daniel Max Kalinowski added to party Pedro Madrigal(pty:pla), Attorney Daniel Max Kalinowski added to party Carmen Z Otero(pty:pla))(Kalinowski, Daniel)
November 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [FRCP 16, 26(f)] ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. (Scheduling Conference set for 1/10/2022 at 10:30 AM before Judge Percy Anderson.) (See order for details) (mrgo)
November 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (See attached document for details) (mrgo)
November 19, 2021 Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh)
November 19, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
November 19, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case and Notice re Consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case was initially assigned to District Judge John W. Holcomb and referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 21-01, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge Percy Anderson. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:21-cv-01960 PA (SHKx). (lh)
November 18, 2021 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, FCA US LLC., filed by Plaintiffs Carmen Z Otero, Pedro Madrigal. (FILED IN SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 9/1/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh)
November 18, 2021 NON-CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint, filed by Defendant FCA US LLC. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh)
November 18, 2021 Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Movant FCA US LLC identifying FCA US LLC as Corporate Parent. (Fellenz, Kyle)
November 18, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Movant FCA US LLC. (Fellenz, Kyle)
November 18, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Bernardino Superior Court, case number CIVSB2125488 Receipt No: ACACDC-32351113 - Fee: $402, filed by defendant FCA US LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Declaration, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Declaration) (Attorney Kyle A Fellenz added to party FCA US LLC(pty:bkmov))(Fellenz, Kyle)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pedro Madrigal et al v. FCA US LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pedro Madrigal
Represented By: Amy-Lyn Morse
Represented By: Daniel Max Kalinowski
Represented By: Steve Mikhov
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carmen Z Otero
Represented By: Amy-Lyn Morse
Represented By: Daniel Max Kalinowski
Represented By: Steve Mikhov
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: FCA US LLC
Represented By: Kyle A Fellenz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?