Manuel Alejandro Barrios v. T. Cisneros
| Manuel Alejandro Barrios |
| T. Cisneros |
| 5:2021cv02031 |
| November 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Stanley Blumenfeld |
| Gail J Standish |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT'S APPLICATION OF ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE A RESPONSE by Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish: It is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The deadline for filing a response to the Petition is extended to March 7, 2022. 2. Petition may file a reply within sixty (60) days of the date of service of the response. Granting #5 APPLICATION for Extension of Time. (es)
|
| Filing 5 APPLICATION to Extend Time to File Answer to 3/7/2022 re Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) #1 filed by Respondent T. Cisneros. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (LaPietra, Vincent) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE of California Attorney General Office Vincent P. LaPietra on behalf of Respondent T. Cisneros. (Attorney Vincent P LaPietra added to party T. Cisneros(pty:res))(LaPietra, Vincent) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. Respondent T. Cisneros shall file and serve an Answer to the Petition not later than 2/4/2022. Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. Motions to Dismiss shall be filed by 1/20/2022. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1, #2 Attachment 2) (es)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and referred to Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (jtil) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254), filed by Petitioner Manuel Alejandro Barrios. Case assigned to Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and referred to Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (jtil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Manuel Alejandro Barrios v. T. Cisneros | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Manuel Alejandro Barrios | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: T. Cisneros | |
| Represented By: | Vincent P LaPietra |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
