Davis Moore v. Theresa Cisneros
| Davis Moore |
| Theresa Cisneros |
| 5:2021cv02051 |
| December 7, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Karen E Scott |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER GRANTING ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE ANSWER TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott: (1) The time for filing an Answer to the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is extended to and includes February 23, 2022. (2) Petitioner may file a single Reply responding to matters raised in the Answer within thirty (30) days of the date of service thereof. Granting #6 APPLICATION for Enlargement of Time. (es)
|
| Filing 6 APPLICATION for Enlargement of Time to File Answer to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Respondent Theresa Cisneros. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Chenelia, Kristen) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Kristen Kinnaird Chenelia on behalf of Respondent Theresa Cisneros (Attorney Kristen Kinnaird Chenelia added to party Theresa Cisneros(pty:res))(Chenelia, Kristen) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE TO HABEAS PETITION by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney General's Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Petition, #2 Consent Form CV11B) (jdo)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Dale S. Fischer and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (jtil) |
| Filing 2 [CIVIL COVER SHEET] PETITION Civil Case Sheet with filing fee previously paid (5.00 paid on 12/07/2021,, filed by Petitioner Davis Moore.(Norton, Marc) Modified on 12/9/2021 (jtil). |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (28 USC 2254), Receipt No. ACACDC-32439952 for $5 filing fee, filed by Petitioner Davis Moore. (Attorney Marc Eric Norton added to party Davis Moore(pty:pet))(Norton, Marc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Davis Moore v. Theresa Cisneros | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Davis Moore | |
| Represented By: | Marc Eric Norton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Theresa Cisneros | |
| Represented By: | Kristen Kinnaird Chenelia |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
