Shawn Powell v. Unknown
Shawn D. Powell |
Unknown and Heather Shirley |
5:2021cv02052 |
December 6, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
David O Carter |
Pedro V Castillo |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 5 APPLICATION for Enlargement of Time to File Response filed by Respondent Heather Shirley. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (LaPietra, Vincent) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE of California Attorney General Office Vincent P. LaPietra on behalf of Respondent Heather Shirley. (Attorney Vincent P LaPietra added to party Heather Shirley(pty:res))(LaPietra, Vincent) |
![]() |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge David O. Carter and referred to Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (Attachments: #1 CV111/CV69) (jtil) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254), filed by Petitioner Shawn D. Powell. Case assigned to Judge David O. Carter and referred to Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (jtil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.