Shawn Powell v. Unknown
Petitioner: Shawn D. Powell
Respondent: Unknown and Heather Shirley
Case Number: 5:2021cv02052
Filed: December 6, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: David O Carter
Referring Judge: Pedro V Castillo
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo: granting #5 APPLICATION for Enlargement of Time to File. 1. The deadline for filing a response to the Petition is extended to February 22, 2022. 2. Petitioner may file a reply within thirty days of the date of service of the response. (hr)
January 14, 2022 Filing 5 APPLICATION for Enlargement of Time to File Response filed by Respondent Heather Shirley. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (LaPietra, Vincent)
December 28, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE of California Attorney General Office Vincent P. LaPietra on behalf of Respondent Heather Shirley. (Attorney Vincent P LaPietra added to party Heather Shirley(pty:res))(LaPietra, Vincent)
December 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE TO PETITION (28 U.S.C. 2254) by Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. IT IS ORDERED that: Within fourteen days, Respondent shall file and serve a notice of appearance. (see document for further details).Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Petition, #2 Blank Consent Form) (hr)
December 6, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge David O. Carter and referred to Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (Attachments: #1 CV111/CV69) (jtil)
December 6, 2021 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254), filed by Petitioner Shawn D. Powell. Case assigned to Judge David O. Carter and referred to Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (jtil)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shawn Powell v. Unknown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Shawn D. Powell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Unknown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Heather Shirley
Represented By: Vincent P LaPietra
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?