Chad Phillip Wiles v. Experian
Chad Phillip Wiles |
Experian |
5:2021cv02078 |
December 13, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John W Holcomb |
Shashi H Kewalramani |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Experian, identifying the ultimate parent company Experian plc. (Billeci, Matthew) |
Filing 18 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), #1 filed by Defendant Experian.(Billeci, Matthew) |
Filing 17 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Experian answer now due 2/4/2022, re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 filed by Defendant Experian.(Attorney Matthew Thomas Billeci added to party Experian(pty:dft))(Billeci, Matthew) |
Filing 16 EXHIBITS A-M TO SUPPORT THE COMPLAINT #1 Filed filed by Plaintiff Chad Phillip Wiles. (Attachments: #1 Part 2, #2 Part 3)(lom) |
Filing 15 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendant Experian. (yl) |
Filing 14 MINUTE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AS TO WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH RULE 5.2 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AND L.R. 11-3.8 & 5.2-1 (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge John W. Holcomb: The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause why he should not be sanctioned in the amount of $500 for his failure to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules. Plaintiff is required to respond in writing on or before Friday, January 7, 2022, at 12:00 noon. IT IS SO ORDERED. (See document for further details) (yl) |
Filing 13 NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER: by Judge John W. Holcomb, ORDERING Exhibit A - M submitted by Plaintiff Chad Phillip Wiles received on 12/14/2021 is not to be filed but instead rejected. Denial based on: L.R. 11-3.8 (Lacking name, address, phone, facsimile numbers, and e-mail address) & L.R. 5.2-1: Redaction. It is the responsibility of the filer to ensure full compliance with the redaction requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2. (iva) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/21/2021: #8 Exhibit A - M Part 1, #9 Exhibit A - M Part 2, #10 Exhibit A - M Part 3, #11 Exhibit A - M Part 4, #12 Exhibit A - M Part 5, #13 Exhibit A - M Part 6, #14 Exhibit A - M Part 7, #15 Exhibit A - M Part 8, #16 Exhibit A - M Part 9, #17 Exhibit A - M Part 10, #18 Exhibit A - M Part 11) (iva). |
Filing 12 SELF-REPRESENTATION ORDER by Judge John W. Holcomb. (iva) |
Filing 11 Text Only Entry - IN CHAMBERS by Judge John W. Holcomb: Notice Regarding Electronic Document Submission System for People Without Lawyers. People who are not represented by attorneys may now submit documents for filing through the Court's Electronic Document Submission System ("EDSS") instead of mailing or bringing documents to the Clerk's Office. EDSS is not the same as filing documents electronically in the Court's CM/ECF System. Registration is not required to use EDSS and you do not need a PACER account; only internet access and an e-mail address are required. Attorneys may not use EDSS to submit documents on behalf of their clients. To access EDSS and for additional information, visit the Court's website at https://apps.cacd.uscourts.gov/edss. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (iva) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 10 STANDING ORDER by Judge John W. Holcomb. (iva) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Re: Settlement Conference #8 Order does not pertain to this case. (dc) |
Filing 7 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani: granting #3 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60) re REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support #3 . (dc) |
Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John W. Holcomb and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (et) |
Filing 8 MINUTES OF Settlement Conference held before Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani: Court and counsel engaged in settlement discussions off the record. The parties were unable to reach a settlement. Court Recorder: n/a. (dc) |
Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Chad Phillip Wiles. (et) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Chad Phillip Wiles. (et) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendant Experian. Case assigned to Judge John W. Holcomb for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani., filed by Plaintiff Chad Phillip Wiles. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (et) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Chad Phillip Wiles v. Experian | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Chad Phillip Wiles | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Experian | |
Represented By: | Matthew Thomas Billeci |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.