Donald Ray Shapiro v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Donald Ray Shapiro
Defendant: Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC, The Mortgage Law Firm PLC and DOES 1-100, inclusive
Case Number: 5:2021cv02132
Filed: December 22, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John W Holcomb
Referring Judge: Sheri Pym
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING CASE FORLACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge John W. Holcomb. As of today's date, Plaintiff has not filed an amended pleading. Accordingly, the Clerk is DIRECTED to close the case. IT IS SO ORDERED. See minute order for details. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lom)
December 28, 2021 Filing 14 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil)
December 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 SELF-REPRESENTATION ORDER by Judge John W. Holcomb. (iva)
December 28, 2021 Filing 12 Text Only Entry - IN CHAMBERS by Judge John W. Holcomb: Notice Regarding Electronic Document Submission System for People Without Lawyers. People who are not represented by attorneys may now submit documents for filing through the Court's Electronic Document Submission System ("EDSS") instead of mailing or bringing documents to the Clerk's Office. EDSS is not the same as filing documents electronically in the Court's CM/ECF System. Registration is not required to use EDSS and you do not need a PACER account; only internet access and an e-mail address are required. Attorneys may not use EDSS to submit documents on behalf of their clients. To access EDSS and for additional information, visit the Court's website at https://apps.cacd.uscourts.gov/edss. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (iva) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
December 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 STANDING ORDER by Judge John W. Holcomb. (iva)
December 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER ON EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER [ECF No. 2] (INCHAMBERS) by Judge John W. Holcomb re: EX PARTE APPLICATION for TRO #2 . For those reasons, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows: 1. Shapiro's Application is DENIED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 2. Because Shapiro's Complaint fails to establish that this Court possesses diversity jurisdiction, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. At his option, Shapiro may file an amended pleading on or before January 7, 2022, that corrects the jurisdictional deficiencies identified herein. If Shapiro fails to do so, the Court will DIRECT the Clerk to close this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. (iva)
December 22, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil)
December 22, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John W. Holcomb and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (jtil)
December 22, 2021 Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendant Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC. (jtil)
December 22, 2021 Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint, #1 as to Defendant The Mortgage Law Firm PLC. (jtil)
December 22, 2021 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Donald Ray Shapiro. (jtil)
December 22, 2021 Filing 4 MEMORANDUM of Points and Authorities in Support of Ex Parte Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction filed by Plaintiff Donald Ray Shapiro. (jtil)
December 22, 2021 Filing 3 DECLARATION of Donald Ray Shapiro in Support of APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to For Order and Preliminary Injunction #2 filed by Plaintiff Donald Ray Shapiro. (jtil)
December 22, 2021 Filing 2 Ex PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order And Preliminary Injunction filed by Plaintiff Donald Ray Shapiro. #1 Lodged Proposed Order) (jtil).
December 22, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Donald Ray Shapiro. against Defendants Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC, The Mortgage Law Firm PLC.Case assigned to Judge John W. Holcomb for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (Filing fee $ 402 Paid.) (Attachments: #1 CV71) (jtil)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Donald Ray Shapiro v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Donald Ray Shapiro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Mortgage Law Firm PLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1-100, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?